Microdose follicular flare: a viable alternative for normal-responding patients undergoing in vitro fertilization?
- PMID: 18249365
- PMCID: PMC2651032
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.018
Microdose follicular flare: a viable alternative for normal-responding patients undergoing in vitro fertilization?
Abstract
Objective: To compare cycle outcomes among normal-responding patients <or=30 years old receiving microdose follicular flare (MDF) and long-luteal agonist (LL).
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Military-based assisted reproductive technology (ART) center.
Patient(s): First autologous ART cycles among 499 women <or=30 years old from January 1999 to December 2005.
Intervention(s): After oral contraceptive pill (OCP) administration before cycle start, patients were nonrandomly assigned to either LL or MDF for LH surge suppression. Patients in the LL group received 1 mg/day leuprolide acetate (LA) on cycle day 21, which was reduced to 0.25 mg/day 10-14 days later. Patients in the MDF group received LA (40 microg twice a day) beginning 3 days after discontinuing OCPs. Both groups received a combination of hMG and recombinant FSH.
Main outcome measure(s): Primary outcomes were implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live-birth rates; in-cycle variables included peak E(2), oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturity, and fertilization rate.
Result(s): Multivariable models controlling for confounding by treatment indication found no significant differences between groups in implantation (MDF, 36%; LL, 38%), clinical pregnancy (MDF, 53%; LL, 56%), and live-birth rates (MDF, 47%; LL, 50%). No differences were observed in peak E(2), oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturity, fertilization rate, or embryos transferred.
Conclusion(s): MDF use among normal-responding ART patients produced no differences in cycle outcome when compared with LL. Therefore, MDF may be a viable alternative for normal-responding patients.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Janssens RM, Lambalk CB, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Bernards JM, Rekers-Mombarg LT, et al. Dose-finding study of triptorelin acetate for prevention of a premature LH surge in IVF: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2333–40. - PubMed
-
- San Roman GA, Surrey ES, Judd HL, Kerin JF. A prospective randomized comparison of luteal phase versus concurrent follicular phase initiation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:744–9. - PubMed
-
- Hughes EG, Fedorkow DM, Daya S, Sagle MA, Van de Koppel P, Collins JA. The routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:888–96. - PubMed
-
- Porter RN, Smith W, Craft IL, Abdulwahid NA, Jacobs HS. Induction of ovulation for in-vitro fertilisation using buserelin and gonadotropins. Lancet. 1984;2:1284–5. - PubMed
-
- van Loenen AC, Huirne JA, Schats R, Hompes PG, Lambalk CB. GnRH agonists, antagonists, and assisted conception. Semin Reprod Med. 2002;20:349–64. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
