Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jan 12;4(2):39-50.
doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2003.0033.

Breast imaging in the new era

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Breast imaging in the new era

K Planche et al. Cancer Imaging. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

In the last decade,there have been huge advances in the field of breast imaging.Full field digital mammography systems optimise lesion to background contrast with resultant improvement in the sensitivity of the technique for cancer detection, facilitated by computer-aided detection.Though mammography remains the only established modality for population-based screening, preliminary results from several large studies indicate that magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) has a role in high-risk patients.On the other hand, advances in ultrasound, MRI and nuclear medicine have the potential to greatly improve the specificity of breast imaging with regard to cancer detection and lesion characterisation.A number of new and experimental techniques are being developed which may have great impact in this area and these will be discussed. Though MRI now has an established place in the diagnosis of breast cancer, it is becoming clear that it can directly affect surgical and medical management by enabling assessment of response to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and facilitating choice of the most appropriate surgery.Just as the role of MRI has evolved,so too the place of nuclear medicine, particularly positron emission tomography and radio-immunoscintigraphy should become clearer in the next few years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conventional film–screen (a) and digital (b) mammograms of the same patient, taken on the same day. Note much improved contrast detail within the glandular parenchyma with simultaneous visualisation of the skin on the digital image.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sequential ultrasonographic images with power Doppler interrogation depicting the arrival of a bolus of microbubble contrast agent at a malignant tumour (figure courtesy of Dr E Moskovic, Royal Marsden Hospital). Note typical malignant tumour vascularisation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a, b) Staging MRI scans from a patient with suspected multifocal breast cancer. There is a type III time-intensity curve typical of malignancy (a). Note the presence of satellite nodules adjacent to the main tumour mass, well shown on the MIP image (b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
3D T1W gradient-echo MRI scan, with fat suppression, from a patient with a screen-detected cancer which was missed at excision. This post-contrast sagittal image clearly demonstrates an irregular enhancing malignant mass some distance from the linear enhancement seen in the surgical scar.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Tc99m hHMFG-1 radioimmunoscintigraphy. Positive right axillary nodes and breast cancer (figure courtesy of Professor K E Britton, St Bartholomew’s Hospital; reproduced by permission from: Br J Cancer 2002; 86: 870–8).

References

    1. Sickles E. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology. 1991;179:463–8. - PubMed
    1. Lidbrink E, Elfving J, Fussell J, Jonsson E. Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial. Br Med J. 1996;312:273–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burrell HC, Pinder SE, Wilson AR , et al. The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 nonpalpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol. 1996;51:277–81. - PubMed
    1. Pisano ED, Chandramouli J, Hemminger BM , et al. Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms? J Digit Imaging. 1997;10:79–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D. Screen film versus full field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterisation of lesions. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1697–702. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources