Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Feb;51(2):338-42.
doi: 10.1097/00007890-199102000-00013.

Possible contribution of pretransplant immune responder status to renal allograft survival differences of black versus white recipients

Affiliations

Possible contribution of pretransplant immune responder status to renal allograft survival differences of black versus white recipients

R H Kerman et al. Transplantation. 1991 Feb.

Abstract

Black end-stage renal disease patients may present as an immunologically higher-risk group for renal allograft transplantation than white ESRD patients. To test this hypothesis, we correlated graft survivals in 124 black and 241 white cyclosporine-prednisone-treated primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients with pre-Tx nonspecific immune responder status (strong vs. weak immune responders), donor-recipient-specific MLC responsiveness, HLA match, and blood transfusion (BT) history. One-, 2- and 3-year patient survival rates of 95%, 94%, and 94% were identical for both groups. However, the 1-, 2-, 3-year graft survival rates for white recipients of 82%, 79%, and 75% were significantly higher than the 70%, 62%, and 55% rates for black recipients (P less than 0.01 for each, respectively). Pre-Tx nonspecific immune response values for blacks were significantly (P less than 0.01) higher than for whites (38% vs. 28% for active T cell; 1.8 vs. 1.3 for TH:TS ratio; 28,581 c.p.m. vs. 14,870 c.p.m. for spontaneous blastogenesis; and a stimulation index (SI) of 34 vs. 20 for panel mixed lymphocyte culture). Additionally, the specific recipient-donor MLC (SI) for black recipients was significantly greater than the specific recipient-donor MLC for white recipients (MLC SI of 40 vs. 18, P less than 0.01). Blacks present as pre-Tx strong immune responders with a greater frequency than whites (90% vs. 66%, P less than 0.01). Moreover, black strong responders experience a poorer 1-year graft survival than white strong responders (67% vs. 80%, P less than 0.01). Even though the pre-Tx BT histories of white and black ESRD patients studied herein were comparable, the immunoregulatory effect of pre-Tx BT was different in white vs. black patients. A significant reduction in TH:TS ratio was observed when comparing 0 vs. 1-4 pre-Tx white patient BT groups, whereas significant changes in TH:TS ratios were not observed until after comparing 0 vs. greater than or equal to 5 pre-Tx black patient BT groups. HLA matching and pre-Tx BT had no impact on improving the graft survivals of these CsA-Pred-treated white or black recipients. These data, therefore, support the hypothesis that black recipients present as an immunologically higher-risk group than white recipients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources