Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Feb;5(2):e29.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050029.

Lifetime medical costs of obesity: prevention no cure for increasing health expenditure

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Lifetime medical costs of obesity: prevention no cure for increasing health expenditure

Pieter H M van Baal et al. PLoS Med. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and is associated with high medical expenditures. It has been suggested that obesity prevention could result in cost savings. The objective of this study was to estimate the annual and lifetime medical costs attributable to obesity, to compare those to similar costs attributable to smoking, and to discuss the implications for prevention.

Methods and findings: With a simulation model, lifetime health-care costs were estimated for a cohort of obese people aged 20 y at baseline. To assess the impact of obesity, comparisons were made with similar cohorts of smokers and "healthy-living" persons (defined as nonsmokers with a body mass index between 18.5 and 25). Except for relative risk values, all input parameters of the simulation model were based on data from The Netherlands. In sensitivity analyses the effects of epidemiologic parameters and cost definitions were assessed. Until age 56 y, annual health expenditure was highest for obese people. At older ages, smokers incurred higher costs. Because of differences in life expectancy, however, lifetime health expenditure was highest among healthy-living people and lowest for smokers. Obese individuals held an intermediate position. Alternative values of epidemiologic parameters and cost definitions did not alter these conclusions.

Conclusions: Although effective obesity prevention leads to a decrease in costs of obesity-related diseases, this decrease is offset by cost increases due to diseases unrelated to obesity in life-years gained. Obesity prevention may be an important and cost-effective way of improving public health, but it is not a cure for increasing health expenditures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Average Additional Annual per Capita Costs for Smoking and Obese Individuals Compared to “Healthy-Living” Individuals
Figure 2
Figure 2. Differences in Aggregated Health-Care Costs over Time if Successful Prevention Converts the Obese and Smoking Cohort into a Healthy-Living Cohort (Undiscounted and with a Discount Rate of 3%)

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet. 2005;366:1197–1209. - PubMed
    1. Rodgers A, Ezzati M, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, Lin RB, Murray CJ. Distribution of major health risks: findings from the Global Burden of Disease study. PLoS Med. 2004;1:e27. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010027. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Groves T. Pandemic obesity in Europe. BMJ. 2006;333:1081. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roth J, Qiang X, Marban SL, Redelt H, Lowell BC. The obesity pandemic: where have we been and where are we going? Obes Res. 2004;12(Suppl 2):88S–101S. - PubMed
    1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at a glance. Paris: OECD; 2005.

Publication types