Comparing rates of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success, and fetal and maternal complications among family physicians and obstetricians
- PMID: 18254993
- DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32735-9
Comparing rates of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success, and fetal and maternal complications among family physicians and obstetricians
Abstract
Objectives: To determine differences between family physicians and obstetricians in rates of trial of labour (TOL) attempt, vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) success, and maternal-fetal complications.
Methods: We undertook a database evaluation study in an urban Quebec secondary care hospital centre that serves a multiethnic population. Study subjects were pregnant women with at least one previous Caesarean section (CS), who delivered singletons at St. Mary's Hospital Center between January 1995 and December 2003. Outcomes were rates of TOL attempt, of VBAC success and failure, and of uterine rupture or dehiscence.
Results: Of 32 500 singleton deliveries, 3694 (11.4%) women met study criteria. Of these, 3493 (94.6%) were patients of obstetricians, and 201 (5.4%) were patients of family physicians. The TOL attempt rate was 50.6% (1768) and 81.1% (163) for obstetricians and family physicians, respectively (P 0.001). For women having TOL, the VBAC success rate was 64.3% for obstetricians and 76.1% for family physicians (P = 0.002). Rates of uterine rupture or dehiscence in the combined failed and successful VBAC groups were 2.9% for obstetricians and 4.3% for family physicians (P = 0.33) whereas in the failed VBAC group the rates were 7.9% versus 17.9% for the family physicians (P = 0.04). Within delivery outcomes for successful and failed VBAC there were no differences in maternal characteristics and newborn outcomes by physician group.
Conclusion: More patients of family physicians than of obstetricians attempted TOL and had successful VBAC. Newborn outcomes were similar in the two groups, except that in the failed VBAC group, the family doctors had slightly higher uterine rupture or dehiscence rates; given the low power of this study, further studies are needed to confirm and explain this result. Also, given the similarity in patient profiles, the differences in delivery outcomes may be attributable to differences in physician practice styles.
Similar articles
-
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Feb;27(2):164-88. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30188-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005. PMID: 15943001 English, French.
-
SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;89(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.03.015. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005. PMID: 16001462 Review.
-
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 Jul;26(7):660-83; quiz 684-6. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004. PMID: 15248936 English, French.
-
Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor.Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;104(2):273-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000134784.09455.21. Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15291999
-
Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: review of antenatal predictors of success.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003 Apr;25(4):275-86. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31030-1. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003. PMID: 12679819 Review.
Cited by
-
Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in University Hospital Tuzla - According to Robson's Classification.Med Arch. 2016 Jun;70(3):213-6. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.213-216. Epub 2016 May 31. Med Arch. 2016. PMID: 27594749 Free PMC article.
-
Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2065-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30463530 Free PMC article.
-
A Paradigm Shift to Check the Increasing Trend of Cesarean Delivery is the Need of Hour: But How?J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Aug;62(4):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0288-8. Epub 2012 Oct 16. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012. PMID: 23904696 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate - According to Robson's 10-group Classification.Oman Med J. 2012 Sep;27(5):415-7. doi: 10.5001/omj.2012.102. Oman Med J. 2012. PMID: 23074555 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 24;8(10):e022875. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022875. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30361403 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous