Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;33(4):542-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.045. Epub 2008 Feb 5.

First clinical experience and 1-year follow-up with the sutureless 3F-Enable aortic valve prosthesis

Affiliations

First clinical experience and 1-year follow-up with the sutureless 3F-Enable aortic valve prosthesis

Daniel Wendt et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with extracorporeal circulation (ECC) is currently the treatment of choice for symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, patients with multiple high-risk comorbid conditions may benefit from reduced ECC time and thus, reduced myocardial ischemia, by the use of sutureless AVR. We describe the initial experience and 1-year results of our first 3F-Enable AVR implants.

Methods: Between 09/05 and 12/05, six patients (age 74+/-1.8 years; three females) with symptomatic aortic stenosis (NYHA III) underwent AVR with an equine pericardial and nitinol-stented sutureless prosthesis. For additional safety up to three stay sutures were placed. Echocardiography was performed preoperatively, intraoperatively, at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Clinical data, adverse events and patient outcome were recorded prospectively.

Results: Prosthesis sizes were 27 mm (n=3), 25 mm (n=1), 23 mm (n=1) and 21 mm (n=1). ECC time was 87+/-32 min; aortic clamp time was 56+/-24 min. Prosthesis deployment time was 148 +/- 173 s. There were no intraoperative deaths or complications. At 12-month follow-up mean pressure gradients (MPG) were 6.8+/-3.5 mmHg and aortic valve area (AVA) was 2.2 +/- 0.5 cm(2). One patient underwent successful redo AVR after 8 months due to severe paravalvular leakage (PVL), and one patient died due to lung cancer 10 months after surgery. At 12 months follow-up four out of six patients are alive and asymptotic (NYHA I) with the 3F-Enable aortic valve prosthesis, however, one patient showed mild paravalvular leakage.

Conclusions: These first 1-year follow-up data suggest the feasibility of this new concept of sutureless aortic valve implantation. However, severe aortic insufficiency at 8 months and paravalvular leakage at 1-year follow-up should prompt further procedural and device enhancements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources