Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Feb;87(2):488S-92S.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.2.488S.

Echinacea in infection

Affiliations

Echinacea in infection

Diane F Birt et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Ongoing studies have developed strategies for identifying key bioactive compounds and chemical profiles in Echinacea with the goal of improving its human health benefits. Antiviral and antiinflammatory-antipain assays have targeted various classes of chemicals responsible for these activities. Analysis of polar fractions of E. purpurea extracts showed the presence of antiviral activity, with evidence suggesting that polyphenolic compounds other than the known HIV inhibitor, cichoric acid, may be involved. Antiinflammatory activity differed by species, with E. sanguinea having the greatest activity and E. angustifolia, E. pallida, and E. simulata having somewhat less. Fractionation and studies with pure compounds indicate that this activity is explained, at least in part, by the alkamide constituents. Ethanol extracts from Echinacea roots had potent activity as novel agonists of TRPV1, a mammalian pain receptor reported as an integrator of inflammatory pain and hyperalgesia and a prime therapeutic target for analgesic and antiinflammatory drugs. One fraction from E. purpurea ethanol extract was bioactive in this system. Interestingly, the antiinflammatory compounds identified to inhibit prostaglandin E(2) production differed from those involved in TRPV1 receptor activation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Ability of Echinacea purpurea ethanol extract (PI621307) to inhibit HIV replication. Data shown represent the mean ± SEM for each data point from 3 different experiments with triplicate samples in each experiment.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Inhibition of HIV infectivity by Echinacea purpurea fractions. (A) Ability of 7 HPLC-separated fractions (100 μg/mL) to inhibit HIV infection (white bars) or cytotoxicity (black bars). Each bar represents the mean of triplicates. The antiviral activity found in fraction 1 that is highlighted with an asterisk showed efficacy against HIV-1 as determined by a Student’s t test comparing the untreated and treated samples (P = 0.0001). (B) HPLC analysis of E. purpurea fraction 1. Phenolic acid standards were run to allow identification of compounds.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Antiviral activity and cytotoxicity associated with subfractions 1–9 from Echinacea purpurea fraction 1. All HIV infectivity (white bars) and cytotoxicity (black bars) assays were performed with 100 μg/mL of the fraction or subfraction. Values represent the mean ± SEM for 2 experiments performed in triplicate. Asterisks represent findings that are significantly different from control infections as determined by a Student’s t test (P = 0.0001).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Extracts of Echinacea species from different harvest dates were studied at 15 μg/mL for their effects on prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production. Data (originally ng/mL PGE2) were normalized to the DMSO-lipopolysaccharide (LPS)–treated control and are presented as means ± 95% CIs. E. angustifolia, E. pallida, and E. sanguinea (P < 0.001) reduced PGE2 production compared with medium + DMSO controls. Data shown are with LPS; studies were conducted without LPS, but PGE2 values were not altered by Echinacea. *P < 0.05 compared with medium + LPS + DMSO in a Dunnett multiple-comparison test. Redrawn from reference (8).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Preparative HPLC fractions of Echinacea angustifolia soxhlet ethanol extract were assessed for reduction of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production and are presented as means ± 95% CIs. All treatments are shown with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) because the fractions did not alter PGE2 production in the absence of LPS. Fractions 1 and 3 significantly reduced LPS-induced PGE2 production. n = 3. **P < 0.05, representative of a Dunnett multiple-comparison test.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Relative potency of 70% ethanol Echinacea extracts (0.25 mg/mL) on TRPV1 (mean ± SEM, n ≥ 4 independent oocytes for each value). Current responses were normalized in each cell to responses obtained with capsaicin (10 μmol/L). Spinach extract (0.25 mg/mL) was used as the control. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, significantly different when compared with spinach control (Student’s t test). Extracts evoked no responses in water-injected cells.

References

    1. Widrlechner MP, McKeown KA. Assembling and characterizing a comprehensive Echinacea germplasm collection. In: Janick J, Whipkey A, editors. Trends in new crops and new uses. Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press; 2002. pp. 506–8.
    1. Qu L, Wang X, Chen Y, et al. Commercial seed lots exhibit reduced seed dormancy in comparison to wild seed lots of Echinacea purpurea. Hort-Science. 2005;40:1843–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romero FR, Delate K, Hannapel DJ. The effect of seed source, light during germination, and cold-moist stratification on seed germination in three species of Echinacea for organic production. HortScience. 2005;40:1751–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Department of Agriculture. Germplasm Resources Information Network database. [accessed 3 May 2007]. Internet: http://www.arsgrin.gov/npgs.
    1. Turner RB, Bauer R, Woelkart K, Hulsey TC, Gangemi JD. An evaluation of Echinacea angustifolia in experimental rhinovirus infections. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:341–8. - PubMed

Publication types