Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Apr;51(4):1047-51.
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.106062. Epub 2008 Feb 7.

Maternal wave reflections and arterial stiffness in normal pregnancy as assessed by applanation tonometry

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Maternal wave reflections and arterial stiffness in normal pregnancy as assessed by applanation tonometry

Maria L Macedo et al. Hypertension. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Normal pregnancy is associated with profound alterations in the maternal cardiovascular system. The aim of the present study was to assess noninvasively, using applanation tonometry, the maternal central aortic blood pressures (BP), effects of wave reflection and arterial stiffness (aortic and brachial pulse wave velocity) in normal pregnancy. This was a cross sectional study including 193 women with normal singleton pregnancies at 11 to 41 weeks of gestation and 23 nonpregnant controls, matched for age and height. Compared to nonpregnant controls, pregnant women had lower mean arterial pressure (85+/-8.9 mm Hg versus 81.1+/-7.2 mm Hg; P=0.01), central systolic BP (103+/-11 mm Hg versus 96+/-8 mm Hg, P=0.001), central diastolic BP (71+/-9 mm Hg versus 67+/-7 mm Hg, P=0.008), and augmentation index (AIx) (19+/-11% versus 4+/-12%, P<0.001). The AIx changed significantly with gestation reaching its nadir at midpregnancy (R(2)=0.05, P=0.007). This change was present even after adjusting for maternal age (P<0.001), heart rate (P<0.001), and mean arterial BP (P<0.001); known determinants of AIx. The pulse wave velocity (carotid-radial and carotid-femoral) did not change significantly with gestation and was marginally different between pregnant and nonpregnant women (P=0.03 and P=0.05 for carotid-radial and carotid-femoral respectively). However, adjustments for maternal age and mean arterial pressure rendered these differences nonsignificant (P=0.2 for carotid-radial, P=0.5 for carotid-femoral). In summary, we found that normal pregnancy is associated with a reduction in central BP and wave reflection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources