Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic
- PMID: 18262013
- DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60028-1
Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic
Abstract
Statement of problem: Bonding ceramic restorations to tooth structure relies on treatment of the ceramic intaglio surface, selection of a suitable resin luting agent, and appropriate treatment of prepared tooth structure. Various ceramic surface treatments have been advocated which produce different topographies and bond strengths, but little information is available to identify the interaction between the resulting surface topography and bond strength.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on surface roughness and bond strength to dentin and enamel of a commercially available heat-pressed dental ceramic (IPS Empress).
Material and methods: One hundred heat-pressed ceramic disks were fabricated according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=20) and treated with 1 of the following: (1) etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, (2) 50%, or (3) 60% orthophosphoric acid and airborne-particle abrasion with (4) 50-microm, or (5) 250-microm alumina for 10 seconds. Morphological changes obtained with the surface treatments were investigated with a surface texture analyzer on half of the treated specimens. Two additional specimens from each group were treated and prepared for scanning electron microscopy. The specimens were then used for a bond strength test. The treated specimens were silanated and luted with a composite resin luting agent (Nexus 2) to enamel (n=50) and dentin (n=50) surfaces with 10 specimens for each treatment group. The luted specimens were loaded to failure in a universal testing machine in the shear mode with a crosshead speed of 0.05 mm/min. The data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA followed by the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch Multiple Range Test (alpha=.05).
Results: Surface treatments resulted in significant differences for surface topography and shear bond strength (P<.001). Mean surface roughness (Ra) (SD) was (2.54 (0.21) microm) for ceramic surfaces treated with 50-microm aluminum powder. Treatment of ceramic specimens with 50% orthophosphoric acid appeared to result in a smoother surface (1.02 (0.38) microm). The highest mean bond strength (SD) to enamel (14.7 (0.6) MPa) and dentin (8.2 (1.5) MPa) was associated with hydrofluoric acid etching. The lowest mean bond strength (SD) to enamel (2.7 (0.8) MPa) and dentin (1.5 (0.1) MPa) was recorded for 50% phosphoric acid.
Conclusions: Hydrofluoric acid treatment resulted in the generation of pores and grooves that produced the greatest bond strength between the ceramic and tooth dentin and enamel. Orthophosphoric acid treatment was the least effective surface treatment method evaluated. The results are applicable to only the all-ceramic/luting system evaluated.
Similar articles
-
The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):194-202. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60178-X. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 18762031
-
The effect of different etching times of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the shear bond strength of high-leucite ceramics bonded to composite resin.J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jul;98(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60033-X. J Prosthet Dent. 2007. PMID: 17631170
-
Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):394-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.58. J Prosthet Dent. 2003. PMID: 12690353 Clinical Trial.
-
Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):60D-76D. Am J Dent. 2000. PMID: 11763920 Review.
-
To silanate or not to silanate: making a clinical decision.Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000 Aug;21(8):659-62, 664; quiz 666. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000. PMID: 11199656 Review.
Cited by
-
Surface Evaluation of a Novel Acid-Etching Solution for Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate.Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;18(12):2912. doi: 10.3390/ma18122912. Materials (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40573041 Free PMC article.
-
An in vitro study on the bond strength between composite resin and porcelain using different surface treatment and bonding methods.Eur J Oral Sci. 2025 Jun;133(3):e70014. doi: 10.1111/eos.70014. Epub 2025 May 5. Eur J Oral Sci. 2025. PMID: 40325494 Free PMC article.
-
Enamel and Dentin Surface Finishing Influence on the Roughness and Microshear Bond Strength of a Lithium Silicate Glass-Ceramic for Laminate Veneers.Int Sch Res Notices. 2015 Sep 7;2015:243615. doi: 10.1155/2015/243615. eCollection 2015. Int Sch Res Notices. 2015. PMID: 27347507 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of different surface treatments and retainer designs on the retention of posterior Pd-Ag porcelain-fused-to-metal resin-bonded fixed partial dentures.Exp Ther Med. 2018 Feb;15(2):2006-2014. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5630. Epub 2017 Dec 14. Exp Ther Med. 2018. PMID: 29434797 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Duration on the Surface Micromorphology, Roughness, and Wettability of Dental Ceramics.Int J Mol Sci. 2016 May 27;17(6):822. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060822. Int J Mol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27240353 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials