Similar articles

• [Observation studies are essential in many medical questions. But there is a risk of systemic errors].

  Thelander S. Thelander S. Lakartidningen. 2001 Feb 21;98(8):794-6. Lakartidningen. 2001. PMID: 11265560 Swedish. No abstract available.
• Don't be misled by the orthopedic literature : tips for critical appraisal.

  Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM, Struijs PA, Bhandari M, International Evidence-Based Orthopedic Surgery Working Group. Poolman RW, et al. Acta Orthop. 2007 Apr;78(2):162-71. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013636. Acta Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17464602 No abstract available.
• [Critical evaluation of clinical trials].

  Gulácsi L, Kiss I. Gulácsi L, et al. Orv Hetil. 2004 Dec 19;145(51):2575-81. Orv Hetil. 2004. PMID: 15715291 Review. Hungarian.
• [Measuring errors in neonatal randomized controlled trials. Deficient quality concerning the informed consent].

  Finnström O. Finnström O. Lakartidningen. 2001 May 16;98(20):2474-5. Lakartidningen. 2001. PMID: 11433980 Swedish. No abstract available.
• The number, content, and quality of randomized controlled trials in the prevention and care of injuries.

  Stelfox HT, Goverman J. Stelfox HT, et al. J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1488-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181568cfc. J Trauma. 2008. PMID: 19077647 Review.