Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Feb 12;178(4):432-5.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070713.

Optimizing the use of prescription drugs in Canada through the Common Drug Review

Affiliations
Review

Optimizing the use of prescription drugs in Canada through the Common Drug Review

Mike Tierney et al. CMAJ. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1: Summary of the review processes of Health Canada, the Patented Medicines Prices Review Board and the Common Drug Review of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health when reviewing new drugs in Canada.

References

    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Drug expenditure in Canada, 1985 to 2006. Ottawa: The Institute; 2007.
    1. Donaldson C, Shackley P. Economic evaluation. In: Detels R, Holland WW, McEwan J, et al, editors. Oxford textbook of public health. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 849-70.
    1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. CADTH presentation on the Common Drug Review to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health. Ottawa: The Agency; 2007. Available: www.cadth.ca/media/media/CADTH_Submission_to_Standing_Committee_on_Healt... (accessed 2007 Nov 22).
    1. Kallah J. Formulary acceptance: monitoring and evaluation. Provincial Reimbursement Advisor 2006 Nov 9(4):57-77.
    1. Morgan SG, McMahon M, Mitton C, et al. Centralized drug review processes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Health Aff 2006;25:337-47. - PubMed