Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Mar 11;98(5):888-93.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604248. Epub 2008 Feb 12.

The relationship between quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and survival in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer

Affiliations

The relationship between quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and survival in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer

M McKernan et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

It remains unclear whether any aspect of quality of life has a role in predicting survival in an unselected cohort of patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer. Therefore the aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), clinico-pathological characteristics and survival in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer. Patients presenting with gastric or oesophageal cancer, staged using the UICC tumour node metastasis (TNM) classification and who received either potentially curative surgery or palliative treatment between November 1997 and December 2002 (n=152) participated in a quality of life study, using the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire. On univariate analysis, age (P<0.01), tumour length (P<0.0001), TNM stage (P<0.0001), weight loss (P<0.0001), dysphagia score (P<0.001), performance status (P<0.1) and treatment (P<0.0001) were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. EORTC QLQ-C30, physical functioning (P<0.0001), role functioning (P<0.001), cognitive functioning (P<0.01), social functioning (P<0.0001), global quality of life (P<0.0001), fatigue (P<0.0001), nausea/vomiting (P<0.01), pain (P<0.001), dyspnoea (P<0.0001), appetite loss (P<0.0001) and constipation (P<0.05) were also significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. On multivariate survival analysis, tumour stage (P<0.0001), treatment (P<0.001) and appetite loss (P<0.0001) were significant independent predictors of cancer-specific survival. The present study highlights the importance of quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) measures, in particular appetite loss, as a prognostic factor in these patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The relationship between appetite loss (None, A little, Quite a bit, Very much, from top to bottom) and cancer specific survival in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer.

References

    1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osoba D, Razavi D, Rofe PB, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–376 - PubMed
    1. Aaronson NK, Bullinger M, Ahmedzai S (1988) A modular approach to quality of life assessment in cancer clinical trials. Recent Results Cancer Res 111: 231–249 - PubMed
    1. Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, Shinozawa Y, Kitajima M (2000) Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg 232(2): 225–232 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, Alderson D (2001) The prognostic value of quality of life scores during treatment for oesophageal cancer. Gut 49: 227–230 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blazeby JM, Williams MH, Brookes ST, Alderson D, Farndon JR (1995) Quality of life measurement in patients with oesophageal cancer. Gut 37: 505–508 - PMC - PubMed

Substances