Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec 10;1(1):7.
doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-1-7.

Complex proximal femoral fractures in the elderly managed by reconstruction nailing - complications & outcomes: a retrospective analysis

Affiliations

Complex proximal femoral fractures in the elderly managed by reconstruction nailing - complications & outcomes: a retrospective analysis

Ulfin Rethnam et al. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Unstable proximal femoral fractures and pathological lesions involving the trochanteric region in the elderly comprise an increasing workload for the trauma surgeon as the ageing population increases. This study aims to evaluate use of the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail (RTRN) in this group with regard to mortality risk, complication rates and final outcome.

Methods: Retrospective evaluation of 42 patients aged over 60 years who were treated by reconstruction nailing for proximal femoral fractures over a 4 year period.

Results: Over two-thirds of patients were high anaesthetic risk (ASA > 3) with ischemic heart disease the most common co-morbidity. 4 patients died within 30 days of surgery and 4 patients required further surgery for implant related failure. Majority of patients failed to regain their pre-injury mobility status and fewer than half the patients returned to their original domestic residence.

Conclusion: Favourable fixation of unstable complex femoral fractures in the elderly population can be achieved with the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail. However, use of this device in this frail population was associated with a high implant complication and mortality rate that undoubtedly reflected the severity of the injury sustained, co-morbidity within the group and the stress of a major surgical procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Implant failure at 13 months post-op.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reversed "Z" phenomenon ("Back out" of screws causing impingement symptoms).
Figure 3
Figure 3
"Z" phenomenon. (Proximal migration of screw into hip joint).

References

    1. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;19:CD000093. - PubMed
    1. Schipper IB, Marti RK, Van der Werken C. Unstable trochanteric femoral fractures: extramedullary or intramedullary fixation. Review of Literature. Injury. 2004;35:142–151. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00287-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stromsoe K. Fracture fixation problems in osteoporosis. Injury. 2004;35:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.08.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gibbons CL, Gregg-Smith SJ, Carrell TWG, et al. Use of the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail in femoral shaft fractures. Injury. 1995;26:389–392. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00062-E. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kang S, McAndrew MP, Johnson K. The Reconstruction Locked Nail for complex fractures of the proximal femur. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9:453–463. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199509060-00001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources