Response rates, duration of response, and dose response effects in phase I studies of antineoplastics
- PMID: 1827432
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00194562
Response rates, duration of response, and dose response effects in phase I studies of antineoplastics
Abstract
Over a period of 14 years, 7,960 patients were treated in 228 phase I trials. In these patients, there were 75 complete and 432 partial responses for an overall objective response rate of 6%. Complete responses lasted a median of six months (range 1-18), while partial responses lasted a median of three months (range 1-17). Of note is that no drug has made it to the market which has not had a response in phase I trials. Responses were noted in very diverse histologic types of tumors. Although there were responses at doses which were as low as 3-5% of the recommended dose for phase II trials, the majority of responses did occur at 80-120% of the dose recommended for phase II trials. Although the response rate in phase I trials is indeed low, responses do occur. This response rate information should help the clinician provide facts for the patient considering a phase I trial with new anticancer agents. These findings also emphasize that although phase I trials are characteristically dose-finding studies, if no responses are noted in phase I studies, it is unlikely the drug will be used routinely in the clinic.
Similar articles
-
Relationship between objective responses in phase I trials and potential efficacy of non-specific cytotoxic investigational new drugs.Ann Oncol. 2002 Aug;13(8):1300-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf202. Ann Oncol. 2002. PMID: 12181255
-
Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents.Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Sep;70(9):1105-15. Cancer Treat Rep. 1986. PMID: 3527410 Clinical Trial.
-
Therapeutic response and potential pitfalls in phase I clinical trials of anticancer agents conducted in Japan.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;34(6):451-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00685653. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994. PMID: 7923553
-
Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1346-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5913. Epub 2008 Feb 19. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18285606 Review.
-
Mitoxantrone: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis.CNS Drugs. 2004;18(6):379-96. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418060-00010. CNS Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15089110 Review.
Cited by
-
Dose-levels and first signs of efficacy in contemporary oncology phase 1 clinical trials.PLoS One. 2011 Mar 2;6(3):e16633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016633. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21415927 Free PMC article.
-
Further evidence of clinical benefit associated with participation in phase I oncology trials.Br J Cancer. 2008 Mar 25;98(6):1021-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604206. Epub 2008 Mar 18. Br J Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18349816 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Patients in phase I trials of anti-cancer agents in Japan: motivation, comprehension and expectations.Br J Cancer. 1997;76(1):107-13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.344. Br J Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9218741 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
"Classical 3 + 3 design" versus "accelerated titration designs": analysis of 270 phase 1 trials investigating anti-cancer agents.Invest New Drugs. 2009 Dec;27(6):552-6. doi: 10.1007/s10637-008-9213-5. Epub 2009 Jan 10. Invest New Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19132294
-
Building a Phase 1 Cancer Research Program: Lessons Learned and Progress Made.Ochsner J. 2017 Winter;17(4):319-321. Ochsner J. 2017. PMID: 29230114 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources