Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;12(5):921-5.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0485-z. Epub 2008 Feb 16.

Sacral nerve stimulation in patients after rectal resection--preliminary report

Affiliations

Sacral nerve stimulation in patients after rectal resection--preliminary report

Brigitte Holzer et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Sacral nerve stimulation is a widely accepted therapeutic option for neurogenic fecal incontinence. More recently, case reports showed a positive effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal incontinence following low anterior resection. The purpose of this study was to gain more information for this selected indication for sacral nerve stimulation through a nationwide survey.

Material and methods: In the period 2002 to 2005, three Austrian departments reported data of patients who underwent SNS for fecal incontinence following rectal resection. Data were available of seven patients (two female, five male) with a median age of 57 years (min 42; max 79). Six patients had undergone rectal resection as a treatment for low rectal cancer. One patient had undergone rectal resection for Crohn's disease, one patient subtotal colectomy and ileorectostomy for slow colon transit constipation.

Results: Test stimulation was performed in the foramen S3 unilaterally over a median period of 14 days (2-21 days). Seven patients reported a marked reduction of episodes of incontinence during the observation period and received a permanent stimulation system. After a median follow-up of 32 months (17-46), five patients reported a marked improvement of their continence situation.

Conclusion: Despite a nationwide survey experiences with SNS as a treatment for fecal incontinence following rectal resection is still limited. Our observations show an improvement of the continence function following SNS. However, the promising results of our series as well as others need further research and more clinical data by a larger number of patients in a prospective trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Surg. 1989 Aug;76(8):783-6 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Oct;48(10):1858-65; discussion 1865-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1994 Jan;167(1):90-4; discussion 94-5 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 1999 Mar;44(3):407-12 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Sep;44(9):1261-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources