The academic environment: the students' perspective
- PMID: 18289275
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00494.x
The academic environment: the students' perspective
Abstract
Dental education is regarded as a complex, demanding and often stressful pedagogical procedure. Undergraduates, while enrolled in programmes of 4-6 years duration, are required to attain a unique and diverse collection of competences. Despite the major differences in educational systems, philosophies, methods and resources available worldwide, dental students' views regarding their education appear to be relatively convergent. This paper summarizes dental students' standpoint of their studies, showcases their experiences in different educational settings and discusses the characteristics of a positive academic environment. It is a consensus opinion that the 'students' perspective' should be taken into consideration in all discussions and decisions regarding dental education. Moreover, it is suggested that the set of recommendations proposed can improve students' quality of life and well-being, enhance their total educational experience and positively influence their future careers as oral health physicians. The 'ideal' academic environment may be defined as one that best prepares students for their future professional life and contributes towards their personal development, psychosomatic and social well-being. A number of diverse factors significantly influence the way students perceive and experience their education. These range from 'class size', 'leisure time' and 'assessment procedures' to 'relations with peers and faculty', 'ethical climate' and 'extra-curricular opportunities'. Research has revealed that stress symptoms, including psychological and psychosomatic manifestations, are prevalent among dental students. Apparently some stressors are inherent in dental studies. Nevertheless, suggested strategies and preventive interventions can reduce or eliminate many sources of stress and appropriate support services should be readily available. A key point for the Working Group has been the discrimination between 'teaching' and 'learning'. It is suggested that the educational content should be made available to students through a variety of methods, because individual learning styles and preferences vary considerably. Regardless of the educational philosophy adopted, students should be placed at the centre of the process. Moreover, it is critical that they are encouraged to take responsibility for their own learning. Other improvements suggested include increased formative assessment and self-assessment opportunities, reflective portfolios, collaborative learning, familiarization with and increased implementation of information and communication technology applications, early clinical exposure, greater emphasis on qualitative criteria in clinical education, community placements, and other extracurricular experiences such as international exchanges and awareness of minority and global health issues. The establishment of a global network in dental education is firmly supported but to be effective it will need active student representation and involvement.
Similar articles
-
In the students' own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum?J Dent Educ. 2007 May;71(5):632-45. J Dent Educ. 2007. PMID: 17493972
-
North American dental students' perspectives about their clinical education.J Dent Educ. 2006 Apr;70(4):361-77. J Dent Educ. 2006. PMID: 16595529 Review.
-
Students' perceptions of effective learning experiences in dental school: a qualitative study using a critical incident technique.J Dent Educ. 2006 Feb;70(2):124-32. J Dent Educ. 2006. PMID: 16478926
-
Potential of information technology in dental education.Eur J Dent Educ. 2008 Feb;12 Suppl 1:85-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00483.x. Eur J Dent Educ. 2008. PMID: 18289271
-
Educational strategies associated with development of problem-solving, critical thinking, and self-directed learning.J Dent Educ. 2006 Sep;70(9):925-36. J Dent Educ. 2006. PMID: 16954414 Review.
Cited by
-
Insights of dental postgraduate students and guides toward change in MDS examination pattern: A cross-sectional study.Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Aug;13(Suppl 1):S76-S79. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_330_21. Epub 2022 Aug 20. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022. PMID: 36393954 Free PMC article.
-
Teaching stress management in undergraduate dental education: are we doing enough?Br Dent J. 2018 Mar 23;224(6):405-407. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.220. Epub 2018 Mar 16. Br Dent J. 2018. PMID: 29545543
-
Does stress in a dental hygiene and dental therapy undergraduate programme contribute to a sense of well-being in the students?Br Dent J. 2017 Jul 7;223(1):22-26. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.584. Br Dent J. 2017. PMID: 28684834
-
Students' learning environment perception and the transition to clinical training in dentistry.Eur J Dent Educ. 2021 Nov;25(4):829-836. doi: 10.1111/eje.12662. Epub 2021 Feb 2. Eur J Dent Educ. 2021. PMID: 33474787 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the learning environment in prosthodontic department based on Dental College Learning Environment Survey by the graduates of a dental institute in India.J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014 Dec 22;11:34. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.34. eCollection 2014. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014. PMID: 25540978 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources