Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Feb 20:9:13.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-13.

The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) - development and psychometric characteristics

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) - development and psychometric characteristics

Nicola Mead et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Continual quality improvement in primary care is an international priority. In the United Kingdom, the major initiative for improving quality of care is the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QoF) of the 2004 GP contract. Although the primary focus of the QoF is on clinical care, it is acknowledged that a comprehensive assessment of quality also requires valid and reliable measurement of the patient perspective, so financial incentives are included in the contract for general practices to survey patients' views. One questionnaire specified for use in the QoF is the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ). This paper describes the development of the GPAQ (with post-consultation and postal versions) and presents a preliminary examination of the psychometric properties of the questionnaire.

Methods: Description of scale development and preliminary analysis of psychometric characteristics (internal reliability, factor structure), based on a large dataset of routinely collected GPAQ surveys (n = 190,038 responses to the consultation version of GPAQ and 20,309 responses to the postal version) from practices in the United Kingdom during the 2005-6 contract year.

Results: Respondents tend to report generally favourable ratings. Responses were particularly skewed on the GP communication scale, though no more so than for other questionnaires in current use in the UK for which data were available. Factor analysis identified 2 factors that clearly relate to core concepts in primary care quality ('access' and 'interpersonal care') that were common to both version of the GPAQ. The other factors related to 'enablement' in the post-consultation version and 'nursing care' in the postal version.

Conclusion: This preliminary evaluation indicates that the scales of the GPAQ are internally reliable and that the items demonstrate an interpretable factor structure. Issues concerning the distributions of GPAQ responses are discussed. Potential further developments of the item content for the GPAQ are also outlined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development of GPAQ Version 2.0.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of access scores.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of continuity scores.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of communication scores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roland M. Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care. A major experiment in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1448–1454. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr041294. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coulter A. What do patients and the public want from primary care? BMJ. 2005;331:1199–1201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1199. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coulter A, Elwyn G. What do patients want from high quality general practice and how do we involve them in improvement? Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52 (Suppl):S22–S26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bower P. Measuring patients' asessments of primary care quality: the use of self-report questionnaires. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 2003;3:551–560. doi: 10.1586/14737167.3.5.551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker R. DIALOGUE 3rd Edition - a method for surveying patient satisfaction - manual for users. University of Leicester, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care; 2001.

LinkOut - more resources