A review of the safety profile of teicoplanin
- PMID: 1829079
- DOI: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_b.69
A review of the safety profile of teicoplanin
Abstract
Safety of teicoplanin has been assessed in 3377 patients treated in Europe up to the end of June 1990. One or more adverse events were experienced by 10% of patients. Age and teicoplanin dose had no significant effect on the incidence or type of adverse event. In comparative trials the incidence and profile of adverse events to teicoplanin have been similar to those seen with beta-lactam therapy. Impaired renal function occurred consistently more frequently with vancomycin therapy than with teicoplanin therapy, particularly when these drugs were co-administered with aminoglycosides. Severe skin reactions have not been reported with teicoplanin, which, unlike vancomycin, does not cause infusion rate-related release of histamine. These data provide further evidence that teicoplanin is safer than vancomycin and does not have dose-related adverse effects in the dose range 3-10 mg/kg.
Similar articles
-
Comparative safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1998 May;10(2):143-52. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(98)00025-9. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1998. PMID: 9716291 Review.
-
Double-blind comparison of teicoplanin versus vancomycin in febrile neutropenic patients receiving concomitant tobramycin and piperacillin: effect on cyclosporin A-associated nephrotoxicity.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Nov;35(11):2246-52. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.11.2246. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991. PMID: 1839490 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin.J Chemother. 2000 Nov;12 Suppl 5:21-5. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.2000.11782314. J Chemother. 2000. PMID: 11131960 Review.
-
Teicoplanin in perspective. A critical comparison with vancomycin.Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1991 Aug 23;13(4):153-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01957739. Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1991. PMID: 1834985 Review.
-
Teicoplanin administration in patients experiencing reactions to vancomycin.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 May;23(5):810-2. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.5.810. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989. PMID: 2527221 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Anti-gram-positive agents. What we have and what we would like.Drugs. 1997;54 Suppl 6:29-38. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199700546-00007. Drugs. 1997. PMID: 9474479 Review.
-
Teicoplanin induced drug hypersensitivity syndrome.BMJ. 2004 May 29;328(7451):1292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1292. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 15166065 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Teicoplanin alone or combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Aug;38(8):1703-10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.8.1703. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994. PMID: 7985998 Free PMC article.
-
A risk-benefit assessment of teicoplanin in the treatment of infections.Drug Saf. 1995 Nov;13(5):317-28. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199513050-00005. Drug Saf. 1995. PMID: 8785019 Review.
-
Glycopeptides and nephrotoxicity.Intensive Care Med. 1994 Nov;20 Suppl 4:S23-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01713979. Intensive Care Med. 1994. PMID: 7699153 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical