Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;19(4):437-47.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0550-6. Epub 2008 Feb 22.

Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective

Affiliations

Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective

A N A Tosteson et al. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

A United States-specific cost-effectiveness analysis, which incorporated the cost and health consequences of clinical fractures of the hip, spine, forearm, shoulder, rib, pelvis and lower leg, was undertaken to identify the 10-year hip fracture probability required for osteoporosis treatment to be cost-effective for cohorts defined by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. A 3% 10-year risk of hip fracture was generally required for osteoporosis treatment to cost less than $60,000 per QALY gained.

Introduction: Rapid growth of the elderly United States population will result in so many at risk of osteoporosis that economically efficient approaches to osteoporosis care warrant consideration.

Methods: A Markov-cohort model of annual United States age-specific incidence of clinical hip, spine, forearm, shoulder, rib, pelvis and lower leg fractures, costs (2005 US dollars), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment ($600/yr drug cost for 5 years with 35% fracture reduction) by gender and race/ethnicity groups. To determine the 10-year hip fracture probability at which treatment became cost-effective, average annual age-specific probabilities for all fractures were multiplied by a relative risk (RR) that was systematically varied from 0 to 10 until a cost of $60,000 per QALY gained was observed for treatment relative to no intervention.

Results: Osteoporosis treatment was cost-effective when the 10-year hip fracture probability reached approximately 3%. Although the RR at which treatment became cost-effective varied markedly between genders and by race/ethnicity, the absolute 10-year hip fracture probability at which intervention became cost-effective was similar across race/ethnicity groups, but tended to be slightly higher for men than for women.

Conclusions: Application of the WHO risk prediction algorithm to identify individuals with a 3% 10-year hip fracture probability may facilitate efficient osteoporosis treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model health states and initial transitions. Shaded circles show acute events.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model validation results comparing two modeling approaches for white women where fractures modeled include hip, wrist, spine, and other (proximal humerus, rib, pelvis, and tibia/fibula). Approach 1 modeled age-specificfracture incidence-making no distinction between first and subsequent fractures. Approach 2 modeled age-specific incidence of first fracture and increased the rate at which subsequent fractures occurred.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Absolute 10-year hip fracture risk by age and race at which it is cost-effective to treat (shown by lines) and average 10-year hip fracture risk by age and race (shown by vertical bars) for A) women and B) men in the United States.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Absolute 10-year hip fracture risk by age and race at which it is cost-effective to treat (shown by lines) and average 10-year hip fracture risk by age and race (shown by vertical bars) for A) women and B) men in the United States.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Among white women, the impact of drug treatment cost ($300, $600 or $900 per year) and willingness-to-pay threshold ($50K, $60K, or $75K per QALY gained) on (A) relative risk required to achieve cost-effectiveness where relative risks are computed using 10-year average risk of fracture for the general population at each age (B) absolute 10-year hip fracture risk at which treatment becomes cost-effective in the United States.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Among white women, the impact of drug treatment cost ($300, $600 or $900 per year) and willingness-to-pay threshold ($50K, $60K, or $75K per QALY gained) on (A) relative risk required to achieve cost-effectiveness where relative risks are computed using 10-year average risk of fracture for the general population at each age (B) absolute 10-year hip fracture risk at which treatment becomes cost-effective in the United States.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The impact that duration in fracture-related loss in quality of life (5-year, 10-year or lifetime duration) has on the absolute 10-year risk of hip fracture at which treatment becomes cost-effective is shown for white women in the United States.

References

    1. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C, Johansson H, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Oden A, Zethraeus N, Pfleger B, Khaltaev N. Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporosis International. 2005;16:581–589. - PubMed
    1. Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, Dargent P, Dawson-Hughes B, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman J, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Melton L, Oden A, Papapoulos S, Pols H, Rizzoli R, Silman A, Tenenhouse A, International Osteoporosis F. National Osteoporosis F A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International. 2002;13:527–536. - PubMed
    1. . Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Introduction. Osteoporosis International. 1998;8 4:S7–80. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health and Human Services. Bone Health and Osteoporosis A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: 2004.
    1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–475. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms