Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Jul;199(1):59.e1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.059. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003

Henry Chong Lee  1 , Yasser Y El-Sayed, Jeffrey B Gould
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003

Henry Chong Lee et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine whether cesarean delivery for breech has increased in the United States.

Study design: We calculated cesarean rates for term singletons in breech/malpresentation from 1997 to 2003 using National Center for Health Statistics data. We compared rates by sociodemographic groups and state. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to see whether factors associated with cesarean delivery differed over time.

Results: Breech cesarean rates increased overall from 83.8% to 85.1%. There was a significant increase in rates for most sociodemographic groups. There was little to no increase for mothers younger than 30 years old. There was wide variability in rates by state, 61.6-94.2% in 1997. Higher breech incidence correlated with lower cesarean rates, suggesting potential state bias in reporting breech.

Conclusion: In the United States, breech infants are predominantly born by cesarean. There was a small increase in this trend from 1998 to 2002. There is wide variability by state, which is not explained by sociodemographic patterns and may be due to reporting differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation of cesarean rate for breech / malpresentation vs. incidence of breech / malpresentation.R=−0.66,R2=0.44
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–1383. - PubMed
    1. Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):917–927. - PubMed
    1. Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):864–871. - PubMed
    1. Glezerman M. Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(1):20–25. - PubMed
    1. Alexandersson O, Bixo M, Hogberg U. Evidence-based changes in term breech delivery practice in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(6):584–587. - PubMed

Publication types