Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Mar 17;26(12):1501-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.029. Epub 2008 Feb 4.

Mouse models for the study of mucosal vaccination against otitis media

Affiliations
Review

Mouse models for the study of mucosal vaccination against otitis media

Albert Sabirov et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Otitis media (OM) is one of the most common infectious diseases in humans. The pathogenesis of OM involves nasopharyngeal (NP) colonization and retrograde ascension of the pathogen up the Eustachian tube into the middle ear (ME). Due to increasing rates of antibiotic resistance, there is an urgent need for vaccines to prevent infections caused by the most common causes of bacterial OM, including nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Moraxella catarrhalis. Current vaccine strategies aim to diminish bacterial NP carriage, thereby reducing the likelihood of developing acute OM. To be effective, vaccination should induce local mucosal immunity both in the ME and in the NP. Studies in animal models have demonstrated that the intranasal route of vaccination is particularly effective at inducing immune responses in the nasal passage and ME for protection against OM. The mouse is increasingly used in these models, because of the availability of murine reagents and the existence of technology to manipulate murine models of disease immunologically and genetically. Previous studies confirmed the suitability of the mouse as a model for inflammatory processes in acute OM. Here, we discuss various murine models of OM and review the applicability of these models to assess the efficacy of mucosal vaccination and the mechanisms responsible for protection. In addition, we discuss various mucosal vaccine antigens, mucosal adjuvants and mucosal delivery systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Induction of mucosal immunity following intranasal or oral administration of vaccine. The priming of antigen-specific, IgA-committed B cells occurs in the mucosal inductive sites and results in IgA antibody responses in effector tissues. NALT: nasal-associated lymphoid tissue; GALT: gut-associated lymphoid tissue; LP: lamina propria; SIgA: secretory IgA; MØ: macrophages; DC: dendritic cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moyle PM, McGeary RP, Blanchfield JT, Toth I. Mucosal immunisation: adjuvants and delivery systems. Curr Drug Deliv. 2004;1(4):385–96. - PubMed
    1. Krekorian TD, Keithley EM, Fierer J, Harris JP. Type B Haemophilus influenzae-induced otitis media in the mouse. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(6 Pt 1):648–56. - PubMed
    1. Melhus A, Ryan AF. A mouse model for acute otitis media. APMIS. 2003;111(10):989–94. - PubMed
    1. Bikhazi P, Ryan AF. Expression of immunoregulatory cytokines during acute and chronic middle ear immune response. Laryngoscope. 1995;105(6):629–34. - PubMed
    1. Johnson M, Leonard G, Kreutzer DL. Murine model of interleukin-8-induced otitis media. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(10):1405–8. - PubMed

Publication types