Validity of the BOD POD for assessing body composition in athletic high school boys
- PMID: 18296985
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f60ce
Validity of the BOD POD for assessing body composition in athletic high school boys
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to validate the percentage of body fat (%BF) values estimated from the BOD POD (BP) with those obtained from hydrostatic weighing (HW) in athletic American high school boys. Additionally, the %BF values measured via near-infrared interactance (NIR), bioelectrical impedance (BIA), and skinfold (SF) were compared to HW to determine the validity of these measures. Thirty white boys (mean age +/- SD = 15.8 +/- 1.0 years) who where currently participating in organized sports volunteered to have their %BF estimated. Measurements were obtained from NIR, BP, BIA, and SF in random order and concluded with HW. The findings from the present study indicated that the NIR and BIA instruments produced significant (P < 0.008) constant error (CE) and total error (TE) values that were too large to be of practical value (TE > 4.0%BF). The BP produced a significantly (P < 0.008) higher CE with acceptable TE values compared to HW, but compared to all three SF estimations, the BP TE values were higher. Two of the SF equations were nonsignificant (P > 0.008) and had the lowest TE values compared to HW. These data suggest that the BP can produce acceptable body fat measures for athletic white boys but is not superior to estimates made by the SF equations used in this study.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the BOD POD and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis for estimating percent body fat in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III collegiate wrestlers.J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):85-91. doi: 10.1519/14053.1. J Strength Cond Res. 2005. PMID: 15705050
-
Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percent body fat in collegiate track and field female athletes: a comparison of four methods.J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Nov;22(6):1985-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318185f196. J Strength Cond Res. 2008. PMID: 18978611
-
Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percent fat in female college athletes.J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Nov;16(4):599-605. J Strength Cond Res. 2002. PMID: 12423192
-
Assessing body composition before and after resistance or endurance training.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 May;29(5):705-12. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199705000-00019. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997. PMID: 9140911
-
Body composition in athletes and sports nutrition: an examination of the bioimpedance analysis technique.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jan;67 Suppl 1:S54-9. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.165. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013. PMID: 23299872 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of diet consumption, body composition and lipoprotein lipid values of Kuwaiti fencing players with international norms.J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2011 Oct 12;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1550-2783-8-13. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2011. PMID: 21992447 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity on overnight and next-day hypoglycemia in active adolescents with type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2014;37(5):1272-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1973. Epub 2014 Feb 26. Diabetes Care. 2014. PMID: 24574352 Free PMC article.
-
Consistency of a mobile body composition trailer: a novel portable laboratory assessment?Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 Sep;37(5):544-547. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12340. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28776929 Free PMC article.
-
Body composition assessment in a large cohort of Olympic athletes with different training loads: possible reference values for fat mass and fat-free mass domains.Acta Diabetol. 2024 Mar;61(3):361-372. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02203-y. Epub 2023 Nov 9. Acta Diabetol. 2024. PMID: 37945991 Free PMC article.
-
Methodologies to assess paediatric adiposity.Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Mar;184(1):53-68. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1124-1. Epub 2014 May 4. Ir J Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 24791970 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous