Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Mar;22(1):68-77.
doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.1.68.

Heavy episodic drinking: determining the predictive utility of five or more drinks

Affiliations

Heavy episodic drinking: determining the predictive utility of five or more drinks

Kristina M Jackson. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Although the heavy episodic drinking (HED) measure of 5+ drinks (sometimes 4+ for women) is used extensively, there is no empirical basis for the designation of 5 drinks as the threshold (vs. another threshold that may perform equally). The present study sought to determine the threshold for HED that maximally predicts proximal and distal adverse-drinking-related outcomes. Participants included 115 young adults (57% female; 96% Caucasian) who partook in an 8-week Internet survey that assessed daily drinking as well as next-day hangover; 10 months later, adverse outcomes (problem drinking, alcohol-related problems, maximum number of drinks, and drug use) were surveyed. Thresholds were computed, with a range from 1+ drinks to 15+ drinks, and outcomes were predicted from each threshold. Findings for hangover measures showed relatively good convergence across multiple indicators, with greatest prediction occurring at a threshold of 10+ drinks per occasion. Different thresholds were observed for long-term outcomes, with higher thresholds indicative of outcomes with greater severity. Although alternatives to HED, such as subjective effects and blood alcohol concentration, can indicate risky drinking, a threshold measure of HED may have advantages in terms of prevention and of intervention efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of days that men and women consumed alcohol at each of the heavy episodic drinking thresholds.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unstandardized regression parameters for multilevel models predicting hangover symptomatology from heavy drinking comparisons, for full sample (square), for men (triangle), and for women (circle).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Unstandardized regression parameters for models predicting distal outcomes 1 year later from heavy drinking comparisons, for full sample (square), for men (triangle), and for women (circle). For problem drinking, the parameter for the highest threshold (15+) for women was β = − 2.03, but for the sake of presentation it was graphed at β = −.38, the value for the 14+ threshold.

References

    1. Beirness DJ, Foss RD, Vogel-Sprott M. Drinking on campus: Self-reports and breath tests. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2004;65:600–604. - PubMed
    1. Beirness DJ, Foss RD, Vogel-Sprott M. Drinking on campus: Self-reports and breath tests: Response. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2005;66:439–440. - PubMed
    1. Bierut LJ, Saccone NL, Rice JP, Goate A, Foroud T, Edenberg H, et al. Defining alcohol-related phenotypes in humans: The Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. Alcohol Research and Health. 2002;26:208–213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borsari B, Neal DJ, Collins SE, Carey KB. Differential utility of three indexes of risky drinking for predicting alcohol problems in college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2001;15:321–324. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cahalan D, Cisin IH, Crossley HM. American drinking practices: A national study of drinking behavior and attitudes (Monograph No. 6) New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies; 1969.

Publication types