Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Feb;121(2):545-554.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000297638.76602.de.

The evolving role of springs in craniofacial surgery: the first 100 clinical cases

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The evolving role of springs in craniofacial surgery: the first 100 clinical cases

Claes G K Lauritzen et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The use of springs in craniofacial surgery originated at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in 1997 as a way of remodeling the cranial vault postoperatively.

Methods: The hospital records of the first 100 operations involving spring placement were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were recorded.

Results: Two hundred forty-six springs were used in 96 patients. Results for sagittal, metopic, bicoronal, multiple synostoses, and midface surgery are presented. In total, five patients (5 percent) required further surgery because of undercorrection. There were no major complications. Spring dislodgement (5 percent) was the most common complication in early cases. Raised intracranial pressure resulted in a protocol change with the use of compressive springs. The data compare favorably with those of standard craniofacial procedures performed in the same unit.

Conclusions: This therapeutic modality in craniofacial surgery has allowed minimization of the extent of surgery without compromising clinical outcomes. Springs have now become part of the authors' treatment protocol for craniosynostosis and midface surgery. The authors have shown the use of these techniques to be safe and, in selected situations, to offer significant advantages over other methods of treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lauritzen, C., Friede, H., Elander, A., et al. Dynamic cranioplasty for brachycephaly. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 98: 7, 1996.
    1. Persing, J. A., Babler, W. J., Nagorsky, M. J., Edgerton, M. T., and Jane, J. A. Skull expansion in experimental craniosynostosis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 78: 594, 1986.
    1. Lauritzen, C., Sugawara, Y., Kocabalkan, O., et al. Spring mediated dynamic craniofacial reshaping. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Hand Surg. 32: 331, 1998.
    1. Lauritzen, C., Guimaraes-Ferreira, J., Gewalli, F., et al. Implantable springs in reconstructive surgery for craniofacial dyostosis. In Y. Ray Chen (Ed.), Proceedings of the VII International Congress of the International Society of Craniofacial Surgery, Taipei, Taiwan. Bologna, Italy: Monduzzi, 1999. Pp. 111–113.
    1. Lauritzen, C., Guimaraes-Ferreira, J., Gewalli, F., et al. Three years experience with implantable springs in craniofacial surgery. In C. Lauritzen (Ed.), Craniofacial Surgery: Proceedings of the IXth International Congress of the International Society of Craniofacial Surgery, Visby, Sweden, June 17–20, 2001. Bologna, Italy: Monduzzi, 2001. Pp. 165–167.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources