Engaging and recruiting counties in an experiment on implementing evidence-based practice in California
- PMID: 18302015
- PMCID: PMC2562896
- DOI: 10.1007/s10488-008-0167-x
Engaging and recruiting counties in an experiment on implementing evidence-based practice in California
Abstract
There is a growing consensus that implementation of evidence-based intervention and treatment models holds promise to improve the quality of services in child public service systems such as mental health, juvenile justice, and child welfare. Recent policy initiatives to integrate such research-based services into public service systems have created pressure to expand knowledge about implementation methods. Experimental strategies are needed to test multi-level models of implementation in real world contexts. In this article, the initial phase of a randomized trial that tests two methods of implementing Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (an evidence-based intervention that crosses child public service systems) in 40 non-early adopting California counties is described. Results are presented that support the feasibility of using a randomized design to rigorously test contrasting implementation models and engaging system leaders to participate in the trial.
Figures
References
-
- Addis ME, Krasnow AD. A national survey of practicing psychologists’ attitudestoward pscyhotherapy treatment manuals. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology. 2000;68(2):331–339. - PubMed
-
- Aos S, Phipps P, Barnoski R, Leib R. The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime: A review of national research findings with implications for Washington State. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 1999.
-
- Brown CH, Wyman PA, Guo J, Peña J. Dynamic wait-listed designs for randomized trials: New designs for prevention of youth suicide. Clinical Trials. 2006;3:259–271. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical