Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1991 Jun 29;302(6792):1572-6.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6792.1572.

Physiotherapy exercises and back pain: a blinded review

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Physiotherapy exercises and back pain: a blinded review

B W Koes et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the quality of randomised controlled trials of exercise therapy for back pain.

Design: Computer aided search of published papers and blinded assessment of the methods of studies.

Subjects: 23 randomised controlled trials, of which 16 studied exercise therapy given by physiotherapists to individual patients with back pain. Other conservative treatments could be included.

Main outcome measures: Score for quality of methods (based on four main categories: study population, interventions, measurement of effect, and data presentation and analysis) and main conclusion of author(s) with regard to exercise therapy.

Results: Only four studies scored more than 50 points (maximum 100), indicating that most were of poor quality. Six studies found that exercise was better than reference treatments and 10 reported it to be no better or worse than the reference treatment. Those reporting positive results tended to have higher methods scores (4/6 positive v 4/10 negative scored greater than or equal to 42).

Conclusions: No conclusion can be drawn about whether exercise therapy is better than other conservative treatments for back pain or whether a specific type of exercise is more effective. Further trials are needed in which greater attention is paid to methods of study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2(1):37-42 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2(2):117-21 - PubMed
    1. N Z Med J. 1985 May 22;98(779):372-5 - PubMed
    1. Med J Aust. 1982 Feb 20;1(4):160-4 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Mar;11(2):120-2 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources