Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor
- PMID: 18307213
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.5267
Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the learning curve of transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in labor and to compare it with that of digital vaginal examination.
Methods: A student midwife who had never performed digital vaginal examination or ultrasound examination was recruited for this study. Instructions on how to perform digital vaginal examination and ultrasound examination were given before and after completing the first vaginal and ultrasound examinations, and repeated for each subsequent examination for as long as necessary. Digital and ultrasound diagnoses of the fetal head position were always performed first by the student midwife, and repeated by an experienced midwife or physician. The learning curve for identification of the fetal head position by either one of the two methods was analyzed using the cumulative sums (CUSUM) method for measurement errors.
Results: One hundred patients underwent digital vaginal examination and 99 had transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position. An error rate of around 50% for vaginal examination was nearly constant during the first 50 examinations. It decreased subsequently, to stabilize at a low level from the 82(nd) patient. Errors of +/- 180 degrees were the most frequent. The learning curve for ultrasound imaging stabilized earlier than that of vaginal examination, after the 32(nd) patient. The most frequent errors with ultrasound examination were the inability to conclude on a diagnosis, particularly at the beginning of training, followed by errors of +/- 45 degrees.
Conclusions: Based on our findings for the student tested, learning and accuracy of the determination of fetal head position in labor were easier and higher, respectively, with transabdominal sonography than with digital examination. This should encourage physicians to introduce clinical ultrasound examination into their practice. CUSUM charts provide a reliable representation of the learning curve, by accumulating evidence of performance.
Copyright (c) 2008 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;191(2):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.029. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15343230
-
Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):264-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 11896948
-
Determination of fetal head station and position during labor: a new technique that combines ultrasound and a position-tracking system.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;200(4):404.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.051. Epub 2009 Feb 14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19217593
-
[Ultrasound in monitoring of the second stage of labour].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012 Nov;40(11):658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 23. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012. PMID: 23099031 Review. French.
-
[Occipito-posterior fetal head position, maternal and neonatal outcome].Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Aug;59(4):459-64. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17923836 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Impact of additional theoretical training program in the diagnosis of the fetal head position during labor: a prospective observational study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05472-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 36882744 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Maternal positioning to correct occipito-posterior fetal position in labour: a randomised controlled trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Feb 24;14:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-83. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 24564746 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Intrapartum sonography - eccentricity or necessity?J Ultrason. 2015 Jun;15(61):125-36. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2015.0011. Epub 2015 Jun 30. J Ultrason. 2015. PMID: 26675398 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pioneering point-of-care obstetric ultrasound integration in midwifery education - the MEPOCUS study.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1209. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06221-4. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39449045 Free PMC article.
-
Calibrated breast density methods for full field digital mammography: a system for serial quality control and inter-system generalization.Med Phys. 2015 Feb;42(2):623-36. doi: 10.1118/1.4903299. Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 25652480 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical