Minimally invasive management of retroperitoneal fibrosis
- PMID: 18308083
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.026
Minimally invasive management of retroperitoneal fibrosis
Abstract
Objectives: Ureteral obstruction is a common finding in retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF). The management of ureteral obstruction in patients with RPF is challenging and controversial. To our knowledge we are the first to report on laparoscopic ureterolysis (LU) and robotic ureterolysis (RU) for the management of RPF to determine feasibility and success.
Methods: We reviewed the charts of all patients who have undergone laparoscopic ureterolysis with or without robotic assistance at our institution.
Results: Between 2001 and 2006, one surgical team performed laparoscopic ureterolysis with or without robotic assistance on 15 renal units in 10 patients. Mean age was 50.9 years (range, 28 to 71 years). Eight patients presented with back pain and all 15 renal units had radiographic evidence of obstruction. Five patients underwent LU, and 5 underwent RU. Mean operative times for bilateral and unilateral LU were 509.0 and 110 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 362.5 and 50 mL. Mean operative times for bilateral and unilateral RU were 390 and 220.5 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 25 and 35.5 mL. With a mean follow-up of 15.6 months, 90% of all patients were asymptomatic and 86.7% renal units had no signs of obstruction on imaging.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic ureterolysis with or without robotics may be performed with minimal perioperative morbidity and provides excellent success rates for relief of symptoms and obstruction in RPF. RU appears to have better short-term outcomes and is now our technique of choice.
Similar articles
-
Hand-assisted laparoscopic ureterolysis to treat ureteral obstruction secondary to idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: assessment of a novel technique and initial series.Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):46-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.048. Epub 2006 Jun 27. Urology. 2006. PMID: 16806417
-
Comparison of laparoscopic with open approach for ureterolysis in patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis.J Urol. 2008 May;179(5):1875-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.030. Epub 2008 Mar 18. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18353394
-
Robotic ureterolysis for relief of ureteral obstruction from retroperitoneal fibrosis.Urology. 2011 Jun;77(6):1370-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.025. Epub 2011 Feb 5. Urology. 2011. PMID: 21296397
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureterolysis: case report and literature review of the minimally invasive surgical approach.JSLS. 2010 Apr-Jun;14(2):313-9. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12785289145088. JSLS. 2010. PMID: 20932393 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis with bilateral lower ureteric obstruction--a case report with literature review.Singapore Med J. 1998 Sep;39(9):416-7. Singapore Med J. 1998. PMID: 9885722 Review.
Cited by
-
Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: clinical features and long-term renal function outcome.Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Aug;49(8):1327-1334. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1608-9. Epub 2017 May 13. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 28501912
-
Treatment approaches for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMC Rheumatol. 2025 Feb 6;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41927-024-00445-z. BMC Rheumatol. 2025. PMID: 39910636 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction - current status and future directions.Urol Ann. 2018 Jan-Mar;10(1):7-14. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_94_17. Urol Ann. 2018. PMID: 29416268 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Metallic ureteral stent in restoring kidney function: Nine case reports.World J Clin Cases. 2020 Jul 6;8(13):2841-2848. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i13.2841. World J Clin Cases. 2020. PMID: 32742993 Free PMC article.
-
The Resonance and the Allium ureteral stents in the treatment of non-malignant refractory ureterostenosis.BMC Urol. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00815-6. BMC Urol. 2021. PMID: 33827529 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous