Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):311-20.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2555. Epub 2008 Feb 28.

Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations

Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Judith W Dexheimer et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 May-Jun.

Abstract

Preventive care measures remain underutilized despite recommendations to increase their use. The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics, types, and effects of paper- and computer-based interventions for preventive care measures. The study provides an update to a previous systematic review. We included randomized controlled trials that implemented a physician reminder and measured the effects on the frequency of providing preventive care. Of the 1,535 articles identified, 28 met inclusion criteria and were combined with the 33 studies from the previous review. The studies involved 264 preventive care interventions, 4,638 clinicians and 144,605 patients. Implementation strategies included combined paper-based with computer generated reminders in 34 studies (56%), paper-based reminders in 19 studies (31%), and fully computerized reminders in 8 studies (13%). The average increase for the three strategies in delivering preventive care measures ranged between 12% and 14%. Cardiac care and smoking cessation reminders were most effective. Computer-generated prompts were the most commonly implemented reminders. Clinician reminders are a successful approach for increasing the rates of delivering preventive care; however, their effectiveness remains modest. Despite increased implementation of electronic health records, randomized controlled trials evaluating computerized reminder systems are infrequent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of included and excluded studies (1997 to 2004).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preventive care reminder studies by intervention year. If the intervention's start year was not mentioned in the paper, the publication year − 1 was used to estimate an intervention year.

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Tracking Healthy People 2010Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000. November.
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guide to Clinical Preventive Services2nd ed.. Washington, DC: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.
    1. Iglehart JK. The National Committee for Quality Assurance N Engl J Med 1996;335:995-999. - PubMed
    1. Frame PS, Zimmer JG, Werth PL, Hall WJ, Eberly SW. Computer-based vs manual health maintenance tracking. A controlled trial. Arch Fam Med 1994;3:581-588. - PubMed
    1. Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, Maharry K, Kohler RB, McDonald CJ. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients N Engl J Med 2001;345:965-970. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms