Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct;98(10):1881-5.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.116509. Epub 2008 Feb 28.

Misclassification bias and the estimated effect of parental involvement laws on adolescents' reproductive outcomes

Affiliations

Misclassification bias and the estimated effect of parental involvement laws on adolescents' reproductive outcomes

Silvie Colman et al. Am J Public Health. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the presence of misclassification bias in the estimated effect of parental involvement laws on minors' reproductive outcomes when subjection to such laws was measured by age at the time of pregnancy resolution.

Methods: Using data from abortion and birth certificates, we evaluated the effect of Texas's parental notification law on the abortion, birth, and pregnancy rates of adolescents aged 17 years compared with those aged 18 years on the basis of age at the time of pregnancy resolution and age at conception.

Results: On the basis of age at the time of the abortion or birth, the law was associated with a fall of 26%, 7%, and 11% in the abortion, birth, and pregnancy rates, respectively, of 17- relative to 18-year-olds. Based on age at the time of conception, the abortion rate fell 15%, the birth rate rose 2%, and the pregnancy rate remained unchanged.

Conclusions: Previous studies of parental involvement laws should be interpreted with caution because their methodological limitations have resulted in an overestimation of the fall in abortions and underestimation of the rise in births, possibly leading to the erroneous conclusion that pregnancies decline in response to such laws.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Number of abortions, by age in year and months at the time of abortion and by year of conception: Texas, 1999 and 2000. aRefers to the period August 1, 1998, to July 31, 1999. Source. Data from induced termination of pregnancy records from the Texas Department of State Health Services.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Abortion and Reproductive Action Rights League. “Who decides? The status of women's reproductive rights in the United States.” Available at: http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-d.... Accessed November 12, 2007.
    1. Haas-Wilson D. The impact of state abortion restrictions on minors’ demand for abortions. J Hum Resour 1996;31:140–158 - PubMed
    1. Kane T, Staiger D. Teen motherhood and abortion access. Q J Econ 1996;111:467–506
    1. Levine PB. Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior. J Health Econ 2003;22:861–878 - PubMed
    1. Ohsfeldt RL, Gohmann SF. Do parental involvement laws reduce adolescent abortion rates? Contemp Econ Policy 1994;12:65–76 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms