Misclassification bias and the estimated effect of parental involvement laws on adolescents' reproductive outcomes
- PMID: 18309128
- PMCID: PMC2636459
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.116509
Misclassification bias and the estimated effect of parental involvement laws on adolescents' reproductive outcomes
Abstract
Objectives: We evaluated the presence of misclassification bias in the estimated effect of parental involvement laws on minors' reproductive outcomes when subjection to such laws was measured by age at the time of pregnancy resolution.
Methods: Using data from abortion and birth certificates, we evaluated the effect of Texas's parental notification law on the abortion, birth, and pregnancy rates of adolescents aged 17 years compared with those aged 18 years on the basis of age at the time of pregnancy resolution and age at conception.
Results: On the basis of age at the time of the abortion or birth, the law was associated with a fall of 26%, 7%, and 11% in the abortion, birth, and pregnancy rates, respectively, of 17- relative to 18-year-olds. Based on age at the time of conception, the abortion rate fell 15%, the birth rate rose 2%, and the pregnancy rate remained unchanged.
Conclusions: Previous studies of parental involvement laws should be interpreted with caution because their methodological limitations have resulted in an overestimation of the fall in abortions and underestimation of the rise in births, possibly leading to the erroneous conclusion that pregnancies decline in response to such laws.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Minors' behavioral responses to parental involvement laws: delaying abortion until age 18.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Jun;41(2):119-26. doi: 10.1363/4111909. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009. PMID: 19493221
-
Fertility and parental consent for minors to receive contraceptives.Am J Public Health. 2004 Aug;94(8):1347-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.8.1347. Am J Public Health. 2004. PMID: 15284042 Free PMC article.
-
Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior.J Health Econ. 2003 Sep;22(5):861-78. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00063-8. J Health Econ. 2003. PMID: 12946463
-
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511. J Policy Anal Manage. 1993. PMID: 10127357 Review.
-
Parental involvement laws and parent-daughter communication: policy without proof.Contraception. 2010 Oct;82(4):310-3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Aug 30. Contraception. 2010. PMID: 20851223 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Factors influencing parental involvement among minors seeking an abortion: a qualitative study.Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):2207-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302116. Epub 2014 Sep 11. Am J Public Health. 2014. PMID: 25211726 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of parental involvement laws on minors seeking abortion services: a systematic review.Health Aff Sch. 2023 Sep 18;1(4):qxad045. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad045. eCollection 2023 Oct. Health Aff Sch. 2023. PMID: 38756747 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Minimum Wages on Adolescent Fertility: A Nationwide Analysis.Am J Public Health. 2017 Mar;107(3):447-452. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303604. Epub 2017 Jan 19. Am J Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28103069 Free PMC article.
-
Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):978-986. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003190. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30969206 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Parental Involvement Laws on the Abortion Rate of Minors.Demography. 2020 Feb;57(1):323-346. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00853-8. Demography. 2020. PMID: 32030626 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Abortion and Reproductive Action Rights League. “Who decides? The status of women's reproductive rights in the United States.” Available at: http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-d.... Accessed November 12, 2007.
-
- Haas-Wilson D. The impact of state abortion restrictions on minors’ demand for abortions. J Hum Resour 1996;31:140–158 - PubMed
-
- Kane T, Staiger D. Teen motherhood and abortion access. Q J Econ 1996;111:467–506
-
- Levine PB. Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior. J Health Econ 2003;22:861–878 - PubMed
-
- Ohsfeldt RL, Gohmann SF. Do parental involvement laws reduce adolescent abortion rates? Contemp Econ Policy 1994;12:65–76 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical