Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2008 Mar 1;371(9614):725-35.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60342-6.

Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Andrew D Beswick et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: In old age, reduction in physical function leads to loss of independence, the need for hospital and long-term nursing-home care, and premature death. We did a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of community-based complex interventions in preservation of physical function and independence in elderly people.

Methods: We searched systematically for randomised controlled trials assessing community-based multifactorial interventions in elderly people (mean age at least 65 years) living at home with at least 6 months of follow-up. Outcomes studied were living at home, death, nursing-home and hospital admissions, falls, and physical function. We did a meta-analysis of the extracted data.

Findings: We identified 89 trials including 97 984 people. Interventions reduced the risk of not living at home (relative risk [RR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97). Interventions reduced nursing-home admissions (0.87, 0.83-0.90), but not death (1.00, 0.97-1.02). Risk of hospital admissions (0.94, 0.91-0.97) and falls (0.90, 0.86-0.95) were reduced, and physical function (standardised mean difference -0.08, -0.11 to -0.06) was better in the intervention groups than in other groups. Benefit for any specific type or intensity of intervention was not noted. In populations with increased death rates, interventions were associated with reduced nursing-home admission. Benefit in trials was particularly evident in studies started before 1993.

Interpretation: Complex interventions can help elderly people to live safely and independently, and could be tailored to meet individuals' needs and preferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
QUOROM flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative risk (RR) of not living at home

Comment in

References

    1. Age Concern . Adding quality to quantity: older people's views on quality of life and its enhancement. Age Concern; London: 2003.
    1. Phelan EA, Anderson LA, LaCroix AZ, Larson EB. Older adults' views of successful aging—how do they compare with researchers' definitions? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:211–216. - PubMed
    1. British Geriatrics Society Primary and Continuing Care Special Interest Group . The specialist health needs of older people outside an acute hospital setting. British Geriatrics Society; London: 2005.
    1. WHO . Active ageing: a policy framework. World Health Organisation; Geneva: 2002.
    1. Stuck AE, Walthert JM, Nikolaus T, Büla CJ, Hohmann C, Beck JC. Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:445–469. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms