Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;34(6):1038-45.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1046-3. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

Influence of insertion site on central venous catheter colonization and bloodstream infection rates

Affiliations

Influence of insertion site on central venous catheter colonization and bloodstream infection rates

John R Gowardman et al. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To compare colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) rates among three insertion sites (subclavian, internal jugular, femoral) used for central venous catheter (CVC) placement.

Design: Twenty-four-month prospective study, with relative effects analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression.

Setting: Eight-bed intensive care unit.

Patients: Four hundred and ten critically ill patients requiring CVC placement.

Measurements and results: All short-term multi-lumen CVCs, including antimicrobial-coated devices, were studied with management standardized. Six hundred and five CVCs (4,040 catheter days) were analyzed. Colonization and CR-BSI incidence were, respectively, 15.1 (95% CI 13.5-21.0) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-4.2) per 1,000 catheter-days. Colonization was higher at the internal jugular (HR 3.64; 95% CI 1.32-10.00; p=0.01) and femoral (HR 5.15; 95% CI 1.82-14.51; p=0.004) sites than at the subclavian site. The femoral site carried a greater risk of being colonized by non-S. epidermidis species than the subclavian and internal jugular sites combined (HR 4.15; 95% CI 1.79-9.61; p=0.001). CVCs inserted in the Department of Emergency Medicine were more colonized than those inserted in the ICU or operating room (HR 2.66; 95% CI 1.27-5.56; p=0.01), and CVCs were less colonized in females than in males (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.89; p=0.02). No difference in CR-BSI rates was noted between the three sites.

Conclusions: Colonization was lowest at the subclavian site. Regional differences exist with respect to type of pathogen isolated. Colonization was influenced by insertion location and gender. The incidence of CR-BSI was not different.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):2424-7 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jul 1;37(1):65-72 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 1988;14(3):227-31 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;33(1):13-20; discussion 234-5 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2000 May 27;355(9218):1864-8 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources