Diastereomeric difference of inclusion modes between (-)-epicatechin gallate, (-)-epigallocatechin gallate and (+)-gallocatechin gallate, with beta-cyclodextrin in aqueous solvent
- PMID: 18318450
- DOI: 10.1002/mrc.2198
Diastereomeric difference of inclusion modes between (-)-epicatechin gallate, (-)-epigallocatechin gallate and (+)-gallocatechin gallate, with beta-cyclodextrin in aqueous solvent
Erratum in
- Magn Reson Chem. 2008 Oct;46(10):995
Abstract
Inclusion complexes of (-)-epicatechin gallate (ECg) as well as (+)-gallocatechin gallate (GCg) and beta-cyclodextrin (beta-CD) in an aqueous solution were investigated using several NMR techniques and a computational method. ECg and EGCg formed a 1:1 complex with beta-CD, in which the A ring and a portion of the C ring were included from the wide secondary hydroxyl group side of the beta-CD cavity, and the B and B' rings were left outside the cavity. GCg formed a 1:2 complex with beta-CD, in which the A and B rings of GCg were included by two molecules of beta-CD. The difference between the two modes of inclusion of the 1:1 complex of ECg, EGCg.beta-CD and the 1:2 complex of GCg.beta-CD might have resulted from the size of the space between the B and B' rings in aqueous solution. As a result of nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) experiments, GCg was considered to have a large enough space between the B and B' rings to include the B ring in the beta-CD cavity; on the other hand, ECg and EGCg have no such large space.
2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
