Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults
- PMID: 18319413
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1027
Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults
Abstract
Context: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Prevention has focused on the detection and removal of polypoid neoplasms. Data are limited on the significance of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs).
Objectives: To determine the prevalence of NP-CRNs in a veterans hospital population and to characterize their association with colorectal cancer.
Design, setting, and patients: Cross-sectional study at a veterans hospital in California with 1819 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy from July 2003 to June 2004.
Main outcome measures: Endoscopic appearance, location, size, histology, and depth of invasion of neoplasms.
Results: The overall prevalence of NP-CRNs was 9.35% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 8.05%-10.78%; n = 170). The prevalence of NP-CRNs in the subpopulations for screening, surveillance, and symptoms was 5.84% (95% CI, 4.13%-8.00%; n = 36), 15.44% (95% CI, 12.76%-18.44%; n = 101), and 6.01% (95% CI, 4.17%-8.34%; n = 33), respectively. The overall prevalence of NP-CRNs with in situ or submucosal invasive carcinoma was 0.82% (95% CI, 0.46%-1.36%; n = 15); in the screening population, the prevalence was 0.32% (95% CI, 0.04%-1.17%; n = 2). Overall, NP-CRNs were more likely to contain carcinoma (odds ratio, 9.78; 95% CI, 3.93-24.4) than polypoid lesions, irrespective of the size. The positive size-adjusted association of NP-CRNs with in situ or submucosal invasive carcinoma was also observed in subpopulations for screening (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.27-15.3) and surveillance (odds ratio, 63.7; 95% CI, 9.41-431). The depressed type had the highest risk (33%). Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms containing carcinoma were smaller in diameter as compared with the polypoid ones (mean [SD] diameter, 15.9 [10.2] mm vs 19.2 [9.6] mm, respectively). The procedure times did not change appreciably as compared with historical controls.
Conclusion: In this group of veteran patients, NP-CRNs were relatively common lesions diagnosed during routine colonoscopy and had a greater association with carcinoma compared with polypoid neoplasms, irrespective of size.
Comment in
-
Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia in the United States: the parachute is open.JAMA. 2008 Mar 5;299(9):1068-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1068. JAMA. 2008. PMID: 18319420 No abstract available.
-
"Did you check my colon for flat polyps?" Should patients and colonoscopists really be concerned?Gastroenterology. 2008 Jul;135(1):315-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.074. Epub 2008 Jun 9. Gastroenterology. 2008. PMID: 18541152 No abstract available.
-
Screening for nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms.JAMA. 2008 Jun 18;299(23):2743; author reply 2743-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.23.2743-a. JAMA. 2008. PMID: 18559996 No abstract available.
-
Colon cancer screening methods-how low do they go?Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008 Aug;10(4):353. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008. PMID: 18627644 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous