Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure
- PMID: 1832011
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13448.x
Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure
Abstract
Objective: A review of the results of microsurgery for bilateral distal tubal blockage.
Design: A retrospective review.
Setting: Hammersmith Hospital London and local private hospitals.
Subjects: 388 patients with bilateral ampullary occlusion treated between 1971 and 1988 by microsurgery.
Interventions: Full investigation for other causes of infertility followed by abdominal microsurgical salpingostomy. Repeated meticulous follow-up was essential with check laparoscopy one year after surgery.
Main outcome measure: Successful pregnancy in relation to tubal damage.
Results: In 65 women microsurgery followed tubal reocclusion after failed conventionally performed salpingostomy. 74 women (23%) had one term pregnancy after primary salpingostomy and 12 women (18%) after repeat salpingostomy. Over half the women having a term pregnancy subsequently had a second infant. The tubal damage was classified in four stages according to the degree of mucosal damage and tubal fibrosis, the presence of isthmic disease and the quality of tubal and ovarian adhesions. Approximately one quarter of patients had stage I disease and amongst these 39% had babies after primary salpingostomy and 25% after repeat salpingostomy.
Conclusion: Microsurgical salpingostomy is a specialized procedure. Proper selection of patients, competent microsurgical technique and adequate follow-up appear crucial to success. In selected patients treatment by salpingostomy gives better results than multiple cycles of in vitro fertilization.
Similar articles
-
[Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1986;15(3):339-46. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1986. PMID: 3734348 French.
-
Microsurgery versus laparoscopy in distal tubal obstruction hysterosalpingographically or laparoscopically investigated.Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2005;32(3):169-71. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 16433156 Clinical Trial.
-
[Microsurgical therapy in tubal sterility].Zentralbl Gynakol. 1990;112(21):1325-9. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1990. PMID: 2278215 German.
-
Is microsurgery necessary for salpingostomy? The evaluation of results.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Aug;21(3):143-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1981.tb00906.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981. PMID: 7036983 Review.
-
[Possibilities and limits of endoscopic fallopian tube surgery].Zentralbl Gynakol. 1995;117(12):663-9. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1995. PMID: 8585362 Review. German.
Cited by
-
A new classification system for pregnancy prognosis of tubal factor infertility.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 May 15;7(5):1410-6. eCollection 2014. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014. PMID: 24995104 Free PMC article.
-
Tubal surgery or in vitro fertilization (IVF)?J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992 Aug;9(4):309-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01203950. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992. PMID: 1472805 No abstract available.
-
In vitro fertilization: a cost-effective alternative for infertile couples?J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Aug;12(7):418-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02211141. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995. PMID: 8574068
-
Postoperative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD001897. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001897.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 19370571 Free PMC article.
-
Female infertility.BMJ Clin Evid. 2010 Nov 11;2010:0819. BMJ Clin Evid. 2010. PMID: 21406133 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical