Computer-assisted alignment system for tibial component placement in total knee replacement: a radiological study
- PMID: 18320367
- DOI: 10.1007/s12306-007-0002-7
Computer-assisted alignment system for tibial component placement in total knee replacement: a radiological study
Abstract
In total knee replacement (TKR), regarding tibial component positioning, almost all implants offer both an intramedullary and an extramedullary alignment guide, leaving it up to the surgeon which guide to use. However, early failure in TKR can be caused by incorrect positioning or orientation with poor limb alignment. Recently computer-based alignment systems have been developed to help the surgeon to overcome these complications. The Authors retrospectively analysed their experience using a computer-based CT-free alignment system. They assessed the radiological alignment of the tibial components in 38 computer-assisted TKR 6 months after surgery. The frontal tibial component angle (FTC) and the sagittal orientation of the tibial component (slope) were evaluated 6 months after the operation. The results were compared to those achieved with traditional alignment systems. The surgical time was statistically longer in the computer-assisted group but in this group all the tibial components were aligned within 4 degrees of all the ideal measurements in both frontal and sagittal planes.
Similar articles
-
Computer-assisted technique versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems in total knee replacement: a radiological comparison.Acta Orthop Belg. 2005 Dec;71(6):703-9. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005. PMID: 16459861
-
Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(2):86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408. Comput Aided Surg. 2012. PMID: 22348661
-
Mini-incision versus mini-incision and computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement: a radiological prospective randomised study.Knee. 2007 Dec;14(6):443-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Sep 19. Knee. 2007. PMID: 17884510 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation Devices versus Conventional Guides in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.J Knee Surg. 2020 Jul;33(7):691-703. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685145. Epub 2019 Apr 8. J Knee Surg. 2020. PMID: 30959545
-
Computer navigation vs extramedullary guide for sagittal alignment of tibial components: radiographic study and meta-analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2012 Apr;27(4):630-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Sep 13. J Arthroplasty. 2012. PMID: 21917415 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical outcome and quality of life after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, single-surgeon study and review of the literature.Chir Organi Mov. 2009 Dec;93(3):115-22. doi: 10.1007/s12306-009-0042-2. Epub 2009 Oct 30. Chir Organi Mov. 2009. PMID: 19876709 Review.
-
The Mark Coventry Award: Custom Cutting Guides Do Not Improve Total Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes at 2 Years Followup.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):40-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4216-y. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 25712865 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Precision Alignment Technology to Circumvent Patient-Specific Roadblocks in Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series.Kans J Med. 2017 Aug 30;10(3):1-14. eCollection 2017 Aug. Kans J Med. 2017. PMID: 29472973 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical