Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Mar 28;26(15):1826-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.055. Epub 2008 Feb 22.

Parent-collected respiratory specimens--a novel method for respiratory virus and vaccine efficacy research

Affiliations

Parent-collected respiratory specimens--a novel method for respiratory virus and vaccine efficacy research

Stephen B Lambert et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Population-based respiratory research and vaccine efficacy studies have previously required clinic or home visits when a subject had an acute respiratory illness. This method may mean parents are unwilling to enroll their child or report an illness of interest. We conducted a community-based cohort study into respiratory illnesses in 234 pre-school aged children using parent-collected specimens. Between January 2003 and January 2004 there were 563 specimens collected from 730 identified illnesses and these were tested using a panel of respiratory virus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays; 409 (73%) were positive for any virus. Specimens were not more likely to be positive when collected by a healthcare worker parent, when they included a throat swab, or when a very good collection technique was reported. A delay from illness onset to specimen collection of up to 5 days did not appear to impact on sensitivity of virus identification, but a delay of six or more days with minor delays in testing saw positivity fall. Combined with daily symptom diary completion and PCR testing, parent-collected specimens are an efficient and acceptable method for the conduct of future vaccine efficacy studies and other community-based respiratory virus research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ashkenazi S., Vertruyen A., Aristegui J., Esposito S., McKeith D.D., Klemola T. Superior relative efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine compared with inactivated influenza vaccine in young children with recurrent respiratory tract infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:870–879. - PubMed
    1. Fleming D.M., Crovari P., Wahn U., Klemola T., Schlesinger Y., Langussis A. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of live attenuated cold-adapted influenza vaccine, trivalent, with trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine in children and adolescents with asthma. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:860–869. - PubMed
    1. Belshe R.B., Edwards K.M., Vesikari T., Black S.V., Walker R.E., Hultquist M. Live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccine in infants and young children. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:685–696. - PubMed
    1. Lambert S.B., Allen K.M., Druce J.D., Birch C.J., Mackay I.M., Carlin J.B. Community epidemiology of human metapneumovirus, human coronavirus NL63, and other respiratory viruses in healthy preschool-aged children using parent-collected specimens. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e929–e937. - PubMed
    1. Lambert S., Allen K., Carter R., Nolan T. The cost of community-managed respiratory viral illnesses in healthy preschool-aged children. Respir Res. 2008;9:11. - PMC - PubMed