An increased risk for non allo-immunization related intrauterine fetal death in RhD-negative patients
- PMID: 18330822
- DOI: 10.1080/14767050801928804
An increased risk for non allo-immunization related intrauterine fetal death in RhD-negative patients
Abstract
Objective: To investigate immediate perinatal outcome of RhD-negative patients carrying RhD-positive fetuses who received antenatal Rh immunoglobulin for the prevention of RhD-mediated hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.
Methods: A retrospective population-based analysis was conducted comparing pregnancies of all RhD-negative women who received antenatal Rh immunoglobulin prophylaxis (anti-D), to RhD-positive parturients, during the years 1988-2003. All women were RhD-negative without evidence of RhD sensitization. Patients received anti-D during the 28-30th week of pregnancy, and an additional dosage within 72 hours following delivery after confirmation of the newborn's RhD status.
Results: Of 145,437 deliveries during the study period, 6.8% were of RhD-negative women (n = 9961). Perinatal mortality rate was significantly higher among the RhD-negative women who received antenatal prophylaxis rhesus immunoglobulin as compared with the controls (17/1000 vs. 12/1000, OR = 1.3, 95%CI 1.2-1.6; p < 0.001). This higher mortality rate was related to a higher rate of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) (10/1000 vs. 6/1000, OR = 1.5, 95%CI 1.2-1.9; p < 0.001). The association remained significant after controlling for RhD isoimmunization leading to hydrops fetalis, using the Mantel-Haenszel technique (weighted OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5; p = 0.001). The rate of RhD isoimmunization was 0.6% (n = 58). Using a multivariable analysis with IUFD as the outcome variable, controlling for known confounders for fetal demise, RhD-negative status was an independent risk factor for IUFD.
Conclusion: RhD-negative women carrying RhD-positive newborns are at an increased risk for IUFD despite Rh immunoprophylaxis.
Similar articles
-
[Prevention of fetomaternal rhesus-D allo-immunization. Practical aspects].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006 Feb;35(1 Suppl):1S123-1S130. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006. PMID: 16495838 Review. French.
-
The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative.BJOG. 2004 Sep;111(9):903-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00226.x. BJOG. 2004. PMID: 15327602
-
[Epidemiology of anti-D allo-immunization during pregnancy].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006 Feb;35(1 Suppl):1S87-1S92. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006. PMID: 16495833 Review. French.
-
RhD haemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn.Blood Rev. 2000 Mar;14(1):44-61. doi: 10.1054/blre.1999.0123. Blood Rev. 2000. PMID: 10805260 Review.
-
[The importance of antenatal immunoprophylaxis for prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn].Acta Med Croatica. 2011 Mar;65(1):49-54. Acta Med Croatica. 2011. PMID: 21568074 Croatian.
Cited by
-
Spontaneous first trimester miscarriage rates per woman among parous women with 1 or more pregnancies of 24 weeks or more.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 22;17(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1620-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 29272996 Free PMC article.
-
The role of antenatal immunoprophylaxis in the prevention of maternal-foetal anti-Rh(D) alloimmunisation.Blood Transfus. 2010 Jan;8(1):8-16. doi: 10.2450/2009.0108-09. Blood Transfus. 2010. PMID: 20104273 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources