Comparison of two basophil activation markers CD63 and CD203c in the diagnosis of amoxicillin allergy
- PMID: 18331364
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02960.x
Comparison of two basophil activation markers CD63 and CD203c in the diagnosis of amoxicillin allergy
Abstract
Background: To confirm allergy to beta-lactam (BL), a basophil activation test in flow cytometry based on CD63 up-regulation was described. CD203c is a more recent basophil activation marker and up to day there is no consensus about which marker is the more sensitive one. CD203c has not yet been evaluated in the diagnosis of BL allergy.
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the reliability of CD203c to CD63 for the diagnosis of amoxicillin (AX) allergy, which is nowadays the most frequent BL allergy.
Methods: Twenty-seven patients with an immediate positive skin test (ST) to AX, 20 had had anaphylaxis with AX and 7 had urticaria and/or angioedema, were compared with 14 controls with no allergy to BL and to six patients with delayed positive ST to AX.
Results: In the anaphylaxis group, AX induced up-regulation of CD203c in the basophils of 12 patients out of 20 (60%) and of CD63 in four patients (20%) (P<0.02). Two patients out of seven with urticaria or angioedema had a positive result with CD203c and CD63. In patients who had anaphylaxis, ampicillin (AMP) induced CD203c up-regulation in eight out of 12 (67%) patients tested, and CD63 up-regulation in 4 out of 12 (33%) (all patients who had anaphylaxis could not be tested with AMP). False-positive results were observed with CD203c as well as CD63, and for 10 patients indeed this was confirmed by a negative drug provocation test. The origin of conflicting results between CD63 and CD203c might be at least the targeting of basophils based on anti-IgE labelling. Among IgE(+) gated cells, by means of CD33, a marker of monocytes, a contamination up to 50% by monocytes was detected. In contrast to CD63, CD203c is an activation marker specific of basophils with a basal low-level expression in resting basophils. Thus, IgE and CD203c double targeting of basophils avoids the contamination by monocytes.
Conclusion: CD203c seems to be a more sensitive activation marker of basophils than CD63 for the diagnosis of amoxicillin allergy.
Comment in
-
Is this time for CRTH2/DP2 in a flow cytometric basophil activation test?Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 Jul;38(7):1239-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03021.x. Epub 2008 May 12. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008. PMID: 18477015 No abstract available.
-
CCR3 for basophil activation test: a necessary but insufficient step.Clin Exp Allergy. 2010 Jun;40(6):953; author reply 954. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03516.x. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010. PMID: 20557552 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Flow cytometry for basophil activation markers: the measurement of CD203c up-regulation is as reliable as CD63 expression in the diagnosis of cat allergy.J Immunol Methods. 2007 Mar 30;320(1-2):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 3. J Immunol Methods. 2007. PMID: 17275019
-
Upregulation of CD63 or CD203c alone or in combination is not sensitive in the diagnosis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intolerance.Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2009;150(3):261-70. doi: 10.1159/000222678. Epub 2009 Jun 4. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2009. PMID: 19494523 Clinical Trial.
-
The basophil activation test in immediate-type drug allergy.Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2009 Aug;29(3):555-66. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2009.04.011. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2009. PMID: 19563997 Review.
-
Basophil CD63 expression assay on highly sensitized atopic donor leucocytes-a useful method in chronic autoimmune urticaria.Br J Dermatol. 2004 Aug;151(2):388-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06042.x. Br J Dermatol. 2004. PMID: 15327546
-
Recent advances in the diagnosis of drug allergy.Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Aug;7(4):299-303. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e328216f4d4. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007. PMID: 17620820 Review.
Cited by
-
Basophil Reactivity as Biomarker in Immediate Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions-Potential and Limitations.Front Pharmacol. 2016 Jun 17;7:171. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00171. eCollection 2016. Front Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27378928 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In vitro testing for diagnosis of idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions: Implications for pathophysiology.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct;80(4):889-900. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12505. Epub 2015 Jun 1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015. PMID: 25199801 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Update on the management of antibiotic allergy.Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2010 Apr;2(2):77-86. doi: 10.4168/aair.2010.2.2.77. Epub 2010 Mar 24. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2010. PMID: 20358021 Free PMC article.
-
Exploratory analysis of CD63 and CD203c expression in basophils from hazelnut sensitized and allergic individuals.Clin Transl Allergy. 2016 Dec 13;6:45. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0134-7. eCollection 2016. Clin Transl Allergy. 2016. PMID: 27999658 Free PMC article.
-
Immunologic evaluation of drug allergy.Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2012 Sep;4(5):251-63. doi: 10.4168/aair.2012.4.5.251. Epub 2012 May 30. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2012. PMID: 22950030 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous