Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006;8(3):175-8.
doi: 10.1080/13651820500477738.

What affects mortality after the operative management of hepatic abscess?

Affiliations

What affects mortality after the operative management of hepatic abscess?

John D Christein et al. HPB (Oxford). 2006.

Abstract

Background: Historically, the operative mortality associated with hepatic abscess was >50%. More recently, patients have been treated with percutaneous drainage; however, those failing conservative management are treated operatively. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of operation for hepatic abscess in those failing conservative treatment or in those presenting as a surgical emergency.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing operation for hepatic abscess at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota from 1990 to 2003.

Results: Of 288 patients diagnosed with hepatic abscesses, 32 required operation. Percutaneous drainage was the initial treatment in 15 (47%). The remaining 17 were initially managed with operation. Operative indication was septic shock (41%), failed nonoperative management (31%), and failure to make a diagnosis (28%). Operation was drainage (62%) or resection (38%). The morbidity and mortality rates were 41% and 15.6%, respectively. Factors associated with increased operative mortality were shock (p=0.04), INR > 1.5 (p=0.03), WBC >15 000 (p=0.04), AST > 150 U/L (p=0.01), alkaline phosphatase >500 U/L (p=0.03), positive blood cultures (p=0.03), total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dl (p<0.01), multiple abscesses (p=0.01), and second operation (p<0.001). Factors not associated were extent of resection (p>0.10), peritonitis (p>0.10), intensive care admission (p>0.10), polymicrobial infection (p>0.10), and blood transfusion (p>0.10).

Conclusion: Operative intervention is avoided in 89% of patients with hepatic abscess. Septic shock is the most common reason for operation. Patients with septic shock, INR>1.5, WBC>15 000, AST>150 U/L, total bilirubin >2.0 mg/dl, positive blood cultures, or alkaline phosphatase >500 U/L have increased mortality when undergoing operation for hepatic abscess.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ochsner A, DeBakey M, Murray S. Pyogenic abscess of the liver. Am J Surg. 1938;40:292–353.
    1. Sherman JD, Robbins SL. Changing trends in casuistics of hepatic abscess. Am J Med. 1960;28:943–50. - PubMed
    1. Frey CF, Zhu Y, Suzuki M, Isagi S. Liver abscesses. Surg Clin North Am. 1989;69:259–71. - PubMed
    1. Gyorffy EJ, Frey CF, Silva J, Jr, McGahan J. Pyogenic liver abscess: diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Ann Surg. 1987;206:699–705. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sherlock S, Dooley Y. Blackwell; Oxford: 1993. Disease of the liver and biliary system9th edn; pp. 471–502.