Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Oct;18(4):428-32.
doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00225.x. Epub 2007 Jan 24.

Cutting balloon angioplasty for carotid in-stent restenosis: case reports and review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Cutting balloon angioplasty for carotid in-stent restenosis: case reports and review of the literature

Qaisar A Shah et al. J Neuroimaging. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Percutaneous stenting techniques are becoming more commonly used for treatment of carotid artery disease. One outcome of particular concern is in-stent restenosis. Indications for treatment of in-stent restenosis are not clearly defined. Use of traditional balloon angioplasty with or without stent placement is still considered the first option. Cutting balloon angioplasty has recently been used as an alternative treatment option for revascularization of in-stent restenosis with higher procedural success rates and without the use of additional stents. We report our experience with cutting balloon angioplasty in treating 2 patients with carotid in-stent restonosis, and review previous cases reported in the literature. A total of 16 patients have been treated with cutting balloon angioplasty. Among 11 patients for whom the clinical and angiographic information were available, 63% of patients were asymptomatic at the time of treatment, and more than 90% of patients showed either complete angiographic resolution or residual stenosis of less than 30%. Additional stent placement or angioplasty was required in only half of the patients, and 1 patient had recurrent stenosis. The review suggests that the procedure is safe and effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources