Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Mar 12;3(3):e1790.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001790.

Mitigation measures for pandemic influenza in Italy: an individual based model considering different scenarios

Affiliations

Mitigation measures for pandemic influenza in Italy: an individual based model considering different scenarios

Marta Luisa Ciofi degli Atti et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Individual-based models can provide the most reliable estimates of the spread of infectious diseases. In the present study, we evaluated the diffusion of pandemic influenza in Italy and the impact of various control measures, coupling a global SEIR model for importation of cases with an individual based model (IBM) describing the Italian epidemic.

Methodology/principal findings: We co-located the Italian population (57 million inhabitants) to households, schools and workplaces and we assigned travel destinations to match the 2001 census data. We considered different R(0 )values (1.4; 1.7; 2), evaluating the impact of control measures (vaccination, antiviral prophylaxis -AVP-, international air travel restrictions and increased social distancing). The administration of two vaccine doses was considered, assuming that first dose would be administered 1-6 months after the first world case, and different values for vaccine effectiveness (VE). With no interventions, importation would occur 37-77 days after the first world case. Air travel restrictions would delay the importation of the pandemic by 7-37 days. With an R(0 )of 1.4 or 1.7, the use of combined measures would reduce clinical attack rates (AR) from 21-31% to 0.3-4%. Assuming an R(0) of 2, the AR would decrease from 38% to 8%, yet only if vaccination were started within 2 months of the first world case, in combination with a 90% reduction in international air traffic, closure of schools/workplaces for 4 weeks and AVP of household and school/work close contacts of clinical cases. Varying VE would not substantially affect the results.

Conclusions: This IBM, which is based on country-specific demographic data, could be suitable for the real-time evaluation of measures to be undertaken in the event of the emergence of a new pandemic influenza virus. All preventive measures considered should be implemented to mitigate the pandemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Baseline simulations under different R0 scenarios (blue line: R0 = 2; red line: R0 = 1.7; green line: R0 = 1.4).
Bullet points represent the first Italian case and the time elapsed from the first world case.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatial spread of pandemic influenza in Italy, R0 = 1.7.
Red areas represent municipalities where at least one case is present.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Clinical AR, by control measure and scenario (Panel A: R0 = 1.7; Panel B: R0 = 2).
black = baseline results; light blue =  90% air travel restriction; violet = AVP to household contacts; blue = vaccination, administering first dose within 3 months of the first world case for R0 = 1.7, or within 2 months for R0 = 2; grey = 90% air travel restriction+vaccination, as reported for the blue line; green = all control measures combined; red = all control measures combined, extending AVP to school/work close contacts.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Cumulative clinical AR, by age and scenario (Panel A: R0 = 1.7; Panel B: R0 = 2).
Black line represents baseline results; red line represents the standard vaccination strategy (i.e., personnel providing essential services; elderly persons; and 2–18 year-olds); green line represents the effect of limiting vaccination to essential workers and children.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li KS, Guan Y, Wang J, Smith GJ, Xu KM, et al. Genesis of a highly pathogenic and potentially pandemic H5N1 influenza virus in eastern Asia. Nature. 2004;430:209–213. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Epidemiology of WHO-confirmed human cases of avian influenza A(H5N1) infection. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2006;81:249–257. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Outbreak news. Avian influenza, Turkey–update. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2006;81:42–43. - PubMed
    1. Monto AS. Vaccines and antiviral drugs in pandemic preparedness. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:55–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stephenson I, Gust I, Kieny MP, Pervikov Y. Development and evaluation of influenza pandemic vaccines. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:71–72. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types