Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991 Jul;18(7):1060-3.

Iliac crest pain syndrome in low back pain. A double blind, randomized study of local injection therapy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1833543
Clinical Trial

Iliac crest pain syndrome in low back pain. A double blind, randomized study of local injection therapy

G Collée et al. J Rheumatol. 1991 Jul.

Abstract

In a 2-week, double blind, randomized study we compared the efficacy of a single local injection of 5 ml lignocaine, 0.5% (L) with 5 ml isotonic saline (S) in 41 patients with the iliac crest pain syndrome (ICPS), recruited from a rheumatology clinic and from a general practice. For the purpose of comparing both treatment, 2 major outcome variables at the end of the study were defined at the outset: (1) Pain score. In the L group the mean pain score at Day 14 was 30.5, in the S group 43.8; the difference between both treatment groups was significant (p less than 0.05). On subgroup analysis similar results were found in the rheumatology setting (p less than 0.05) but not in the general practice setting (NS). (2) Pain severity compared with baseline. In the L group 52% of patients improved and in the S group 30% (NS). In the general practice clinic there was no significant difference (44 vs 62%); however, in the rheumatology setting 58% of those treated with L were improved compared with 8% in the S group (p less than 0.01). Our data demonstrate an effect of a local injection with lignocaine that is somewhat larger than an injection with saline which also has some beneficial effect. The difference is evident in the rheumatology setting but not in the general practice setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources