The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional, factorial trial
- PMID: 18336721
- PMCID: PMC2217555
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-24
The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional, factorial trial
Abstract
Background: Caesarean section is one of the most commonly performed operations on women throughout the world. Rates have increased in recent years - about 20-25% in many developed countries. Rates in other parts of the world vary widely.A variety of surgical techniques for all elements of the caesarean section operation are in use. Many have not yet been rigorously evaluated in randomised controlled trials, and it is not known whether any are associated with better outcomes for women and babies. Because huge numbers of women undergo caesarean section, even small differences in post-operative morbidity rates between techniques could translate into improved health for substantial numbers of women, and significant cost savings.
Design: CORONIS is a multicentre, fractional, factorial randomised controlled trial and will be conducted in centres in Argentina, Ghana, India, Kenya, Pakistan and Sudan. Women are eligible if they are undergoing their first or second caesarean section through a transverse abdominal incision. Five comparisons will be carried out in one trial, using a 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 fractional factorial design. This design has rarely been used, but is appropriate for the evaluation of several procedures which will be used together in clinical practice. The interventions are:* Blunt versus sharp abdominal entry* Exteriorisation of the uterus for repair versus intra-abdominal repair* Single versus double layer closure of the uterus* Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum (pelvic and parietal)* Chromic catgut versus Polyglactin-910 for uterine repairThe primary outcome is death or maternal infectious morbidity (one or more of the following: antibiotic use for maternal febrile morbidity during postnatal hospital stay, antibiotic use for endometritis, wound infection or peritonitis) or further operative procedures; or blood transfusion. The sample size required is 15,000 women in total; at least 7,586 women in each comparison.
Discussion: Improvements in health from optimising caesarean section techniques are likely to be more significant in developing countries, because the rates of postoperative morbidity in these countries tend to be higher. More women could therefore benefit from improvements in techniques.
Trial registration: The CORONIS Trial is registered in the Current Controlled Trials registry. ISCRTN31089967.
Similar articles
-
Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):234-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60441-9. Epub 2013 May 28. Lancet. 2013. PMID: 23721753 Clinical Trial.
-
Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2016 Jul 2;388(10039):62-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00204-X. Epub 2016 May 4. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27155903 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
CORONIS - International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: the follow-up study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Nov 21;13:215. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-215. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013. PMID: 24261693 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD008726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008726.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33661539 Free PMC article.
-
Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6(6):CD007462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007462.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32580252 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evidence-based surgical procedures to optimize caesarean outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 May 19;72:102632. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102632. eCollection 2024 Jun. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38812964 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of intra operative hemorrhage by blunt and sharp expansion of uterine incision at cesarean section.Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Nov-Dec;37(7):1994-1998. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.7.4159. Pak J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34912432 Free PMC article.
-
Techniques for caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD004662. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004662.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. PMID: 18254057 Free PMC article.
-
Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.Hum Reprod. 2015 Dec;30(12):2695-702. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev240. Epub 2015 Sep 25. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 26409016 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22;2014(7):CD004732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004732.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25048608 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Menacker F, Curtin SC. Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-99. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001;49:1–16. - PubMed
-
- Thomas J, Paranjothy S. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit report. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2001.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical