Long-term efficacy and safety of a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live-donor renal transplant recipients
- PMID: 18337483
- PMCID: PMC2396928
- DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2007091001
Long-term efficacy and safety of a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live-donor renal transplant recipients
Abstract
Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is a major concern after renal transplantation. To investigate the safety and efficacy of a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen, 132 live-donor renal transplant recipients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab and steroids. The patients were randomized to a maintenance immunosuppression regimen that included steroids, sirolimus, and either low-dose tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Over a mean follow-up period of approximately 5 yr, patient and graft survival did not significantly differ between the two maintenance regimens. Patient survival was 93.8% and 98.5% in the tacrolimus/sirolimus and MMF/sirolimus groups, respectively, and graft survival was 83% and 88%, respectively. However, the MMF/sirolimus group had significantly better renal function, calculated by Cockcroft-Gault, from the second year post-transplant until the last follow-up. In addition, this group was less likely to require a change in their primary immunosuppression regimen than the tacrolimus/sirolimus group (20.8% versus 53.8%, P = 0.001). The safety profile was similar between groups. In summary, after long-term follow-up, a CNI-free maintenance regimen consisting of sirolimus, MMF, and steroids was both safe and efficacious among low to moderate immunologic risk renal transplant recipients.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Comparison of sirolimus with low-dose tacrolimus versus sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live donor renal transplantation.Am J Transplant. 2005 Oct;5(10):2531-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01064.x. Am J Transplant. 2005. PMID: 16162204 Clinical Trial.
-
Mycophenolate and sirolimus as calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression improves renal function better than calcineurin inhibitor-reduction in late cardiac transplant recipients with chronic renal failure.Transplantation. 2009 Mar 15;87(5):726-33. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181963371. Transplantation. 2009. PMID: 19295318 Clinical Trial.
-
Early steroid withdrawal therapy in renal transplant recipients: a steroid-free sirolimus and CellCept-based calcineurin inhibitor-minimization protocol.Clin Transplant. 2007 Jan-Feb;21(1):101-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00613.x. Clin Transplant. 2007. PMID: 17302598
-
Treatment strategies in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity.Pediatr Transplant. 2006 Sep;10(6):721-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00577.x. Pediatr Transplant. 2006. PMID: 16911497 Review.
-
Minimizing calcineurin inhibitor drugs in renal transplantation.Transplant Proc. 2003 May;35(3 Suppl):118S-121S. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(03)00218-5. Transplant Proc. 2003. PMID: 12742481 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety of immunosuppressive drugs used as maintenance therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013 Sep 30;6(10):1170-94. doi: 10.3390/ph6101170. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013. PMID: 24275847 Free PMC article.
-
Is it time to give up with calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation?World J Transplant. 2013 Jun 24;3(2):7-25. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v3.i2.7. World J Transplant. 2013. PMID: 24175203 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Open-Label, Randomized Study of Transition From Tacrolimus to Sirolimus Immunosuppression in Renal Allograft Recipients.Transplant Direct. 2016 Mar 3;2(4):e69. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000579. eCollection 2016 Apr. Transplant Direct. 2016. PMID: 27500260 Free PMC article.
-
Steroid or tacrolimus withdrawal in renal transplant recipients using sirolimus.Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Dec;43(4):1221-8. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0001-3. Epub 2011 Jul 15. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011. PMID: 21761129 Clinical Trial.
-
Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal or tapering for kidney transplant recipients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 21;7(7):CD006750. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006750.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28730648 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Myers BD: Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Kidney Int 30: 964–974, 1986 - PubMed
-
- Remuzzi G, Bertani T: Renal vascular and thrombotic effects of cyclosporine. Am J Kidney Dis 13: 261–272, 1989 - PubMed
-
- Bennett WM, Houghton DC, Buss WC: Cyclosporine-induced renal dysfunction: Correlations between cellular events and whole kidney function. J Am Soc Nephrol 1: 1212–1219, 1991 - PubMed
-
- Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O'squosquo; apos; yConnell PJ, Allen RD, Chapman JR: The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med 349: 2326–2333, 2003 - PubMed
-
- Ducloux D, Fournier V, Bresson-Vautrin C, Rebibou JM, Billerey C, Saint-Hiller Y, Chalpoin JM: Mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients with cyclosporine-associated nephrotoxicity: A preliminary report. Transplantation 65: 1504–1506, 1998 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical