[Transurethral enucleation of the prostate with the holmium: YAG laser system: how much power is necessary?]
- PMID: 18338152
- DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1684-7
[Transurethral enucleation of the prostate with the holmium: YAG laser system: how much power is necessary?]
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intermediate power (50 W) holmium:YAG laser system for transurethral enucleation of the prostate (TULP) with the use of a new mechanical morcellator. Our results are compared with the results of high-powered holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) presented in the literature.
Material and methods: From December 2003 to January 2008, 129 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated by TULP. In 45 cases (group A; 2.0, 12 Hz) we used a bipolar resectoscope (VISTA/ACMI) for morcellation, whereas after that morcellation was accomplished with a modified endoscopic shaver (Wolf). Thirty-nine patients were treated using 25 W (group B; 2.0 J, 12 Hz), and 45 patients were treated using 40 W (group C; 2.2 J 18 Hz), who were compared with 45 matched-pair patients who received transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; group D). Finally, the literature on HoLEP was reviewed.
Results: Bipolar morcellation significantly prolonged the operating time (135 vs. 131 vs. 96 min). The morcellation speed averaged 2.8 (range 1.3-5.2) g/min with no complications. The resection speed (retrieval rate) of 40-W TULP was comparable to that for TURP (0.71 vs. 0.76 g/min). The transfusion rate was lower than for TURP (8% vs. 12%), with a smaller Hb difference (3.1 vs. 3.8 mg/dl). Catheter times (3.4 vs. 4.1 days) were similar; however, hospital stay was significantly shorter after TULP (5.2 vs. 6.8 days). The complication rate was significantly lower (6.6% vs. 13.3%). The efficacy of HoLEP significantly improved with introduction of the morcellator: Resection speed increased from 0.34-0.61 g/min to 0.48-0.82 g/min. HoLEP was better than 40-W TULP regarding transfusion rate (0-4% vs. 8%) and catheter time (1.1-1.5 vs. 3.4 days). Complications and functional results were similar. CONCLUSION[UBERSCHRIFT]: The intermediate-power 50-W holmium laser together with the new morcellator enable safe transurethral enucleation of the prostate. As with HoLEP, the procedure has a significant learning curve. The retrieval times of TULP are similar to those for HoLEP, but the risk of bleeding is higher. New modifications (i.e., thullium laser) will further improve the technique of laser enucleation.
Similar articles
-
A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands (40 to 200 grams).J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1270-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000086948.55973.00. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 14501739 Clinical Trial.
-
Superiority of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate over Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in a Matched-Pair Analysis of Bleeding Complications Under Various Antithrombotic Regimens.J Endourol. 2021 Mar;35(3):328-334. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0321. Epub 2021 Jan 21. J Endourol. 2021. PMID: 32940051
-
Feasibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for recurrent/residual benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E845-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11290.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22702908
-
Comparison of holmium laser enucleation and transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Int Med Res. 2023 Aug;51(8):3000605231190763. doi: 10.1177/03000605231190763. J Int Med Res. 2023. PMID: 37561537 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic obstruction.Br J Surg. 2007 Oct;94(10):1201-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5916. Br J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17729384 Review.
Cited by
-
Does power setting impact surgical outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(2):153-161. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2022.0104. Epub 2022 Jun 22. Cent European J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35937664 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of low power holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A prospective short- and medium-term single-blind randomized trial.Investig Clin Urol. 2023 Sep;64(5):480-488. doi: 10.4111/icu.20230017. Investig Clin Urol. 2023. PMID: 37668204 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Long-term outcome after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate : From monopolar enucleation to HoLEP and from HoLEP to EEP].Urologe A. 2016 Nov;55(11):1446-1454. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0245-8. Urologe A. 2016. PMID: 27714414 German.
-
[Bladder neck sclerosis following prostate surgery : Which therapy when?].Urologe A. 2017 Sep;56(9):1129-1138. doi: 10.1007/s00120-017-0431-3. Urologe A. 2017. PMID: 28646238 Review. German.
-
Watt matters: Safety and efficacy of using a 140-W high-powered holmium laser for enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).Turk J Urol. 2021 Mar;47(2):131-136. doi: 10.5152/tud.2021.20558. Epub 2021 Mar 1. Turk J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33819443 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials