Implementing case management in New York State's partnerships for publicly funded breast cancer screening
- PMID: 18341780
- PMCID: PMC2396986
Implementing case management in New York State's partnerships for publicly funded breast cancer screening
Abstract
Introduction: This research aimed to explore differences in the implementation of case management among local breast cancer screening partnerships in New York State after changes in federal public policy in 1998 and to achieve a better understanding of case management in a new and distinct practice setting. Capacity and willingness to implement change were theorized to explain local differences in implementation. Local breast cancer screening programs that received federal funding through the New York State Department of Health were invited to participate in the study.
Methods: A mail survey was administered to the directors of New York's 53 local breast cancer screening partnerships in 2003. The survey included questions about willingness and capacity to implement case management and a scale to assess case management program philosophy. Factor analysis and correlations were used to compare willingness and capacity with differences in implementation.
Results: Two common factors--task focus and self-identity focus--were identified as factors that differentiated case management programs. Task-focus partnerships undertook a broader range of tasks but were less likely to report autonomy in making program changes. Self-identity partnerships were less likely to report difficulties with other agencies and scored highly on innovation, involvement in work, and interest in client service. Having a nurse as the case manager, being aware of the standards of case management, and providing health education were associated with both task focus and self-identity focus.
Conclusion: The study identified distinct styles of implementation. These styles have implications for the breadth of services provided, such as whether client-level services only are offered. Interagency coordination was facilitated in partnerships with comprehensive case management.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Can case management be used to facilitate diagnostic testing in publicly funded breast cancer screening programs?Soc Work Health Care. 2004;40(2):55-71. doi: 10.1300/j010v40n02_04. Soc Work Health Care. 2004. PMID: 15774363 Review.
-
The provision of public-sector services by family planning agencies in 1995.Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 Jan-Feb;29(1):6-14. Fam Plann Perspect. 1997. PMID: 9119045
-
Examining public health financing in New York State: a methodology for evaluating local and national public health data.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 Sep-Oct;10(5):393-9. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200409000-00004. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004. PMID: 15552762
-
Public safety answering point readiness for wireless E-911 in New York State.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003 Apr-Jun;7(2):199-203. doi: 10.1080/10903120390936770. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003. PMID: 12710778
-
Health policy and case management.Care Manag J. 2000 Fall;2(3):160-8. Care Manag J. 2000. PMID: 11398572 Review.
References
-
- Weiss M. Case management as a tool for clinical integration. Adv Pract Nurs Q. 1998;4(1):9–15. - PubMed
-
- Holloway F, Carson J. Case management: an update. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2001;47(3):21–31. - PubMed
-
- Frankel AJ, Heft-LaPorte H. Tracking case management accountability: a systems approach. J Case Manag. 1998;7(3):105–111. - PubMed
-
- Standards of practice for case management. Little Rock (AR): Case Management Society of America; 2002.
-
- Case Management Standards Work Group. NASW Standards for Social Work Case Management. Washington (DC): National Association of Social Workers; [Accessed September 22, 2000]. http://www.socialworkers.org/practice/standards/ sw_case_mgmt.asp.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical