The incidence of intravascular penetration in medial branch blocks: cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spines
- PMID: 18344846
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166f03d
The incidence of intravascular penetration in medial branch blocks: cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spines
Abstract
Study design: Clinical observational study.
Objective: To quantify the incidence of inadvertent intravascular injections in spinal medial branch blocks in a clinical setting.
Summary of background data: Previous research established the rate of inadvertent intravascular injection in lumbar medial branch blocks at 8%. The incidence of intravascular injection in cervical and thoracic medial branch blocks has not been reported previously. This study establishes the rate of inadvertent intravascular injection in patients receiving medial branch blocks of the cervical and thoracic spines. Further, this study reports a significantly lower rate of inadvertent intravascular injection for lumbar medial branch blocks than previously reported.
Methods: Patients were originally referred to the clinic, for diagnosis and treatment of chronic spinal origin somatic pain. Medial branch blocks were then performed as diagnostic procedures to confirm the zygapophysial joint(s) as the suspected source of pain. Blocks were performed by experienced practitioners on nonidentified patients over a 3-year period. Clinical observations were recorded for 14,312 separate medial branch block levels. The level of the spine and the incidence of inadvertent intravascular injections were recorded.
Results: This study demonstrates that the overall incidence of intravascular penetration in medial branch blocks is rare, with an overall rate of 3.5%. This study also establishes the rate of intravascular injection for levels within the spine: the cervical spine is likely to be intravascular 3.9% of the time and the lumbar spine 3.7%, whereas the thoracic spine is significantly lower, with just 0.7% injections reported as intravascular. Significant differences were also observed between individual vertebral levels.
Conclusion: The false-negative rate for medial branch blocks is likely to be lower than previously reported. The rate of inadvertent intravascular injection for thoracic medial branch blocks is 0.7%. Cervical and lumbar medial branch blocks are associated with an overall rate of 3.9% and 3.7%, respectively. Although these rates are lower than previously reported, the incidence of false-negative blocks still justifies the use of contrast to confirm nonvascular injection.
Similar articles
-
Facet joint pain in chronic spinal pain: an evaluation of prevalence and false-positive rate of diagnostic blocks.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Oct;20(7):539-45. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180577812. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007. PMID: 17912133
-
Cervical medial branch blocks for chronic cervical facet joint pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with one-year follow-up.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Aug 1;33(17):1813-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b8f88. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008. PMID: 18670333 Clinical Trial.
-
Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain.Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):7-111. Pain Physician. 2007. PMID: 17256025
-
Paravertebral block: cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Oct;22(5):637-43. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32832f3277. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009. PMID: 19680122 Review.
-
Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us.Spine J. 2009 Aug;9(8):690-703. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.447. Epub 2008 Sep 11. Spine J. 2009. PMID: 18789773 Review.
Cited by
-
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jan;47(1):3-59. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103031. Epub 2021 Nov 11. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022. PMID: 34764220 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective evaluation of the safety of ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks using the in-plane technique.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Mar 5;50(3):237-242. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105296. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025. PMID: 38508589 Free PMC article.
-
Factfinders for patient safety: Anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents and cervical medial branch procedures.Interv Pain Med. 2022 May 6;1(2):100090. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100090. eCollection 2022 Jun. Interv Pain Med. 2022. PMID: 39239367 Free PMC article.
-
Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.Pain Med. 2021 Nov 26;22(11):2443-2524. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab281. Pain Med. 2021. PMID: 34788462 Free PMC article.
-
Facet joint pain--advances in patient selection and treatment.Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013 Feb;9(2):101-16. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.198. Epub 2012 Nov 20. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013. PMID: 23165358 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials