Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;9(4):251-8.
doi: 10.1080/13651820701457992.

Practical questions in liver metastases of colorectal cancer: general principles of treatment

Affiliations

Practical questions in liver metastases of colorectal cancer: general principles of treatment

Héctor Daniel González et al. HPB (Oxford). 2007.

Abstract

Liver metastases of colorectal cancer are currently treated by multidisciplinary teams using strategies that combine chemotherapy, surgery and ablative techniques. Many patients classically considered non-resectable can now be rescued by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver resection, with similar results to those obtained in initial resections. While many of those patients will recur, repeat resection is a feasible and safe approach if the recurrence is confined to the liver. Several factors that until recently were considered contraindications are now recognized only as adverse prognostic factors and no longer as contraindications for surgery. The current evaluation process to select patients for surgery is no longer focused on what is to be removed but rather on what will remain. The single most important objective is to achieve a complete (R0) resection within the limits of safety in terms of quantity and quality of the remaining liver. An increasing number of patients with synchronous liver metastases are treated by simultaneous resection of the primary and the liver metastatic tumours. Multilobar disease can also be approached by staged procedures that combine neoadjuvant chemotherapy, limited resections in one lobe, embolization or ligation of the contralateral portal vein and a major resection in a second procedure. Extrahepatic disease is no longer a contraindication for surgery provided that an R0 resection can be achieved. A reverse surgical staged approach (liver metastases first, primary second) is another strategy that has appeared recently. Provided that a careful selection is made, elderly patients can also benefit from surgical treatment of liver metastases.

Keywords: chemotherapy; colorectal cancer; hepatectomy; liver diseases (surgery); liver neoplasms (secondary); liver neoplasms (surgery); liver surgery; metastases; neoplasm metastasis; survival rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cavallari A, Vivarelli M, Bellusci R, Montatti R, De Ruvo N, Cucchetti A, et al. Liver metastases from colorectal cancer: present surgical approach. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:2067–71. - PubMed
    1. Adson M. Resection of liver metastases – when is it worthwhile? World J Surg. 1987;11:511–20. - PubMed
    1. Gayowski T, Iwatsuki S, Madariaga J, Selby R, Todo S, Irish W, et al. Experience in hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of clinical and pathologic risk factors. Surgery. 1994;116:703–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nordlinger B, Quilichini M, Parc R, Hannoun L, Delva E, Huguet C. Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Influence on survival of preoperative factors and surgery for recurrences in 80 patients. Ann Surg. 1987;205:256–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scheele J, Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Gall FP. Indicators of prognosis after hepatic resection for colorectal secondaries. Surgery. 1991;110:13–29. - PubMed