Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008;28(4):221-30.
doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828040-00003.

Non-interventional study comparing treatment satisfaction in patients treated with antihistamines

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Non-interventional study comparing treatment satisfaction in patients treated with antihistamines

Christine De Vos et al. Clin Drug Investig. 2008.

Abstract

Background and objective: Allergic rhinitis and urticaria are common allergic disorders that may affect approximately 15% of people at some time in their lives. Antihistamines are the most widely used therapeutic interventions for these disorders but the newer generation agents have differing pharmacokinetic characteristics that may result in different patient satisfaction and preferences. The objective of this study was to investigate patients' and physicians' satisfaction with their current antihistamine treatment for allergic disease.

Methods: In an observational study, physicians in nine European countries completed questionnaires evaluating 7,274 patients treated with an oral antihistamine. The satisfaction of patients and physicians with the efficacy and tolerability of treatment was rated on a visual analogue scale. In addition, the proportion of patients satisfied with treatment (overall satisfaction) and willing to continue treatment with the same antihistamine were assessed. Safety and tolerability data were also gathered.

Results: The results of this study indicate that modern antihistamines are generally considered effective and well tolerated by patients. In general, levocetirizine scored significantly higher in terms of perception of efficacy, tolerability and overall satisfaction. In terms of tolerability, three-quarters of patients were 'very satisfied' and a further fifth were moderately satisfied with levocetirizine and almost all (95%) were happy to continue treatment. Overall, the most commonly reported adverse event in this study was somnolence, a well known effect of antihistamines. The rate of somnolence in the levocetirizine group (3.8%) was similar to that for fexofenadine (both doses) and desloratadine, two products which are considered to be nonsedating antihistamines, and significantly less than half the rate for cetirizine.

Conclusion: Levocetirizine is considered an effective and well tolerated option for treating allergic disease by patients and physicians alike, particularly when the best available effectiveness and tolerability are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr;44(4):191-2 - PubMed
    1. Allergy. 2001 Jan;56(1):50-7 - PubMed
    1. Int J Dermatol. 2006 Apr;45(4):469-74 - PubMed
    1. Allergy. 2003 Jul;58(7):672-5 - PubMed
    1. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2005 May;25(2):263-81, vi - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources